Background: Identification of individual prostatic glandular structures is an important prerequisite to quantitative histological analysis of prostate cancer with the aid of a computer. We have developed a computer method to segment individual glandular units and to extract quantitative image features, for computer identification of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Two sets of digital histology images were used: database I (n = 57) for developing and testing the computer technique, and database II (n = 116) for independent validation. The segmentation technique was based on a k-means clustering and a region-growing method. Computer segmentation results were evaluated subjectively and also compared quantitatively against manual gland outlines, using the Jaccard similarity measure. Quantitative features that were extracted from the computer segmentation results include average gland size, spatial gland density, and average gland circularity. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to combine quantitative image features. Classification performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Jaccard similarity coefficients between computer segmentation and manual outlines of individual glands were between 0.63 and 0.72 for non-cancer and between 0.48 and 0.54 for malignant glands, respectively, similar to an interobserver agreement of 0.79 for non-cancer and 0.75 for malignant glands, respectively. The AUC value for the features of average gland size and gland density combined via LDA was 0.91 for database I and 0.96 for database II. Conclusions: Using a computer, we are able to delineate individual prostatic glands automatically and identify prostatic adenocarcinoma accurately, based on the quantitative image features extracted from computer-segmented glandular structures.
[1]
Anant Madabhushi,et al.
Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology
,
2008,
2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.
[2]
Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.
Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition
,
1972
.
[3]
David G. Stork,et al.
Pattern Classification
,
1973
.
[4]
Anant Madabhushi,et al.
AUTOMATED GRADING OF PROSTATE CANCER USING ARCHITECTURAL AND TEXTURAL IMAGE FEATURES
,
2007,
2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.
[5]
I. Jolliffe.
Principal Component Analysis
,
2002
.
[6]
A. Madabhushi,et al.
Detecting Prostatic Adenocarcinoma From Digitized Histology Using a Multi-Scale Hierarchical Classification Approach
,
2006,
2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[7]
Vipin Kumar,et al.
Introduction to Data Mining
,
2022,
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications.
[8]
Abbes Amira,et al.
A multispectral computer vision system for automatic grading of prostatic neoplasia
,
2002,
Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.