Knowing public services: Cross-sector intermediaries and algorithmic governance in public sector reform

Discourses of public sector reform in the UK have been shaped in recent years by the participation of new kinds of hybrid cross-sector intermediaries such as think tanks, social enterprises and other third sector organisations. This article provides a documentary analysis of Demos, the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts and the Innovation Unit as intermediary organisations in public sector reform, exploring their promotion of modes of digital governance and their mobilisation of new software technologies as models for new kinds of governing practices. These intermediary organisations are generating a model of knowing public services that operates through collecting and analysing big data, consisting of personal information and behavioural data on individual service users, in order to co-produce personalised services. Their objective is a new style of political governance based on human–computer interaction and machine learning techniques in which citizens are to be governed as co-producers of personalised services interacting with the algorithms of database software.

[1]  Eric Mangez,et al.  Governing Knowledge. Comparison, Knowledge-Based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education , 2014 .

[2]  Frede Hvelplund,et al.  Making It Personal , 2010 .

[3]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Making it personal: translational bioinformatics , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Tom Bentley,et al.  A D&R system for education , 2007 .

[5]  H. Molotch.  Think Tanks in America , 2014 .

[6]  D. Alexander,et al.  What Works : evidence centres for social policy , 2013 .

[7]  J. Ozga,et al.  Re-Inventing Public Education , 2010 .

[8]  T. Osborne.  On mediators: Intellectuals and the ideas trade in the knowledge society , 2004 .

[9]  A. Meijer.  Co-production in an Information Age: Individual and Community Engagement Supported by New Media , 2012 .

[10]  Evelyn Ruppert.  Not just another database: the transactions that enact young offenders , 2013 .

[11]  P. Alcock,et al.  Constituting the Third Sector: Processes of Decontestation and Contention Under the UK Labour Governments in England , 2011 .

[12]  John Cheney-Lippold,et al.  A New Algorithmic Identity , 2011 .

[13]  S. Teasdale.  What’s in a Name? Making Sense of Social Enterprise Discourses , 2012 .

[14]  Adrian Mackenzie,et al.  Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity , 2013 .

[15]  N. Rose.  Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought , 1999 .

[16]  Thomas Birtchnell,et al.  Shadow Elite: How the World’s New Power Brokers Undermine Democracy, Government, and the Free Market , 2011 .

[17]  A. Barry.  Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society , 2001 .

[18]  Ben Williamson,et al.  New governing experts in education: Self-learning software, policy labs and transactional pedagogies , 2014 .

[19]  Jakob Arnoldi.  Informational Ideas , 2007 .

[20]  Taco Brandsen,et al.  Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services , 2006 .

[21]  Matthew Zook.  Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life , 2012 .

[22]  M. Cushman,et al.  From the Third Sector to the Big Society: How Changing UK Government Policies Have Eroded Third Sector Trust , 2013 .

[23]  Charles Leadbeater,et al.  Personalisation Through Participation: A New Script for Public Services , 2004 .

[24]  S. Dodd.  Personalising public services: understanding the personalisation narrative , 2013 .

[25]  N. Rose,et al.  Governing Cities: Notes on the Spatialisation of Virtue , 1999 .

[26]  Evelyn Ruppert.  The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices , 2012 .

[27]  R. Macmillan.  Making sense of the Big Society: perspectives from the third sector , 2013 .

[28]  Valerie Hannon,et al.  Developing an Innovation Ecosystem for Education , 2011 .

[29]  V. Pestoff,et al.  Patterns of co-production in public services , 2006 .

[30]  William Davies,et al.  The Emerging Neocommunitarianism , 2012 .

[31]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  Powers of Freedom: Contents , 1999 .

[32]  C. Painter.  The UK Coalition government: Constructing public service reform narratives , 2013 .

[33]  Hartwig Pautz,et al.  Revisiting the think-tank phenomenon , 2011 .

[34]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.