Human Reliability Analysis in Spaceflight Applications

Predicting and mitigating human error in manned spaceflight can be the difference between mission success and lost vehicle or crewmember. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has used the Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Model analysis developed by the nuclear industry during the last 30 years of manned spaceflight to predict human error. Although the analysis has proven to be reliable, it does not take into account operations specific for long duration spaceflight such as crew training and ground support. This article first explains the principles of the Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Model and how it is used at NASA. Then, the probability for error for an International Space Station ingress procedure is calculated using standard performance shaping factors developed for the nuclear power industry. Lastly, the environmental and operational constraints of space flight are used to develop new performance shaping factors specific to a NASA-operated spacecraft. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Human reliability analysis by fuzzy "CREAM". , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  J. Wreathall,et al.  Knowledge-base for the new human reliability analysis method, A Technique for Human Error Analysis (ATHEANA) , 1996 .

[3]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[4]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  CREAM-based communication error analysis method (CEAM) for nuclear power plant operators’ communication , 2011 .

[5]  Yao Wang,et al.  A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Harold S. Blackman,et al.  Human Reliability and Safety Analysis Data Handbook , 1993 .

[7]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[8]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control , 1994 .

[9]  A. D. Swain Accident Sequence Evaluation Program: Human reliability analysis procedure , 1987 .

[10]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Modeling system behavior for risk and reliability analysis using KBARM , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[11]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  R. L. Brune,et al.  Peer-review study of the draft handbook for human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear-power-plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278 , 1983 .