The spatial level of analysis affects the patterns of forest ecosystem services supply and their relationships.

The implementation of the Ecosystem Services (ES) framework (including supply and demand) should be based on accurate spatial assessments to make it useful for land planning or environmental management. Despite the inherent dependence of ES assessments on the spatial resolution at which they are conducted, the studies analyzing these effects on ES supply and their relationships are still scarce. To study the influence of the spatial level of analysis on ES patterns and on the relationships among different ES, we selected seven indicators representing ES supply and three variables that describe forest cover and biodiversity for Catalonia (NE Iberian Peninsula). These indicators were estimated at three different scales: local, municipality and county. Our results showed differences in the ES patterns among the levels of analysis. The higher levels (municipality/county) removed part of the local heterogeneity of the patterns observed at the local scale, particularly for ES indicators characterized by a finely grained, scattered distribution. The relationships between ES indicators were generally similar at the three levels. However, some negative relationships (potential trade-offs) that were detected at the local level changed to positive (and significant) relationships at municipality and county. Spatial autocorrelation showed similarities between patterns at local and municipality levels, but differences with county level. We conclude that the use of high-resolution spatial data is preferable whenever available, in particular when identifying hotspots or trade-offs/synergies is of primary interest. When the main objective is describing broad patterns of ES, intermediate levels (e.g., municipality) are also adequate, as they conserve many of the properties of assessments conducted at finer scales, allowing the integration of data sources and, usually, being more directly relevant for policy-making. In conclusion, our results warn against the uncritical use of coarse (aggregated) spatial ES data and indicators in strategies for land use planning and forest conservation.

[1]  I. Kühn,et al.  Trade-offs between plant species richness and carbon storage in the context of afforestation – Examples from afforestation scenarios in the Mulde Basin, Germany , 2017 .

[2]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Impact of forest management intensity on landscape-level mushroom productivity: A regional model-based scenario analysis , 2014 .

[3]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology , 2012 .

[4]  O. Sala,et al.  Rangeland ecosystem services: Shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand , 2015 .

[5]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[7]  P. Llorens,et al.  Coupling a water balance model with forest inventory data to predict drought stress : the role of forest structural changes vs. climate changes , 2015 .

[8]  M. Onaindia,et al.  Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Kai M. A. Chan,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Conservation Planning: Targeted Benefits vs. Co-Benefits or Costs? , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  S. Gergel,et al.  Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history , 2016 .

[11]  R. Scholes,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends , 2005 .

[12]  Ying Ge,et al.  Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban–rural complexes , 2015 .

[13]  P. Moran.  The Interpretation of Statistical Maps , 1948 .

[14]  J. Roosaare,et al.  Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research , 2009 .

[15]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services , 2014 .

[16]  Nengwang Chen,et al.  A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: Management implications , 2009 .

[17]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPES: CONCEPTS AND STATISTICS , 2005 .

[18]  E. Uuemaa,et al.  Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review , 2013 .

[19]  S. Carver,et al.  Opportunities to utilize traditional phenological knowledge to support adaptive management of social-ecological systems vulnerable to changes in climate and fire regimes , 2016 .

[20]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  A. Getis.  The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics , 2010 .

[22]  Harri Tolvanen,et al.  Spatial information in ecosystem service assessment: data applicability in the cascade model context , 2014 .

[23]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution , 2013 .

[24]  Paul C. Sutton,et al.  SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets , 2002 .

[25]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[26]  Roy P. Remme,et al.  Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  Patrick Meire,et al.  Are ecosystem services adequately quantified , 2017 .

[28]  E. Bennett,et al.  Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  F. Müller,et al.  Use of ecosystem information derived from forest thematic maps for spatial analysis of ecosystem services in northwestern Spain , 2016, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[30]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[31]  Spatial Patterns and Predictors of Forest Carbon Stocks in Western Mediterranean , 2012, Ecosystems.

[32]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services , 2006 .

[33]  Xiangzheng Deng,et al.  A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management , 2016, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[34]  M. Onaindia,et al.  Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation , 2013 .

[35]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012 , 2013 .

[36]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[37]  Emilio Díaz-Varela,et al.  Detection of landscape heterogeneity at multiple scales: Use of the Quadratic Entropy Index , 2016 .

[38]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[39]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review , 2015 .

[40]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments , 2015 .

[41]  P. Harrison,et al.  Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review , 2014 .

[42]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[43]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[45]  D. Richardson,et al.  Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa , 2009 .

[46]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[47]  S. Wunder,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica , 2013, Environmental Conservation.

[48]  C. Kremen.  Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[49]  J. Bonet,et al.  Assessing the distribution of forest ecosystem services in a highly populated Mediterranean region , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[50]  E. Díaz-Varela,et al.  Analysis of spatial scales for ecosystem services: Application of the lacunarity concept at landscape level in Galicia (NW Spain) , 2014 .

[51]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Enhancing ecosystem services maps combining field and environmental data , 2016 .

[52]  Yanfang Liu,et al.  Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area: A case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[53]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[55]  P. Verburg,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives , 2015 .

[56]  Lars Hein,et al.  Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting , 2015 .

[57]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[58]  Thomas Maxwell,et al.  Resolution and predictability: An approach to the scaling problem , 1994, Landscape Ecology.

[59]  M. Onaindia,et al.  Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: a tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[60]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[61]  Yang Liu,et al.  Spatial multi-scale relationships of ecosystem services: A case study using a geostatistical methodology , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[62]  C. Orme,et al.  Global congruence of carbon storage and biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems , 2010 .

[63]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region , 2016 .

[64]  Ilse R. Geijzendorffer,et al.  An assessment of soil erosion prevention by vegetation in Mediterranean Europe: Current trends of ecosystem service provision , 2016 .

[65]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Comparison of remote sensing and plant trait-based modelling to predict ecosystem services in subalpine grasslands , 2014 .

[66]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Mapping from heterogeneous biodiversity monitoring data sources , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[67]  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and their variability across the forests, shrublands and grasslands of peninsular Spain , 2013 .

[68]  Diaz-Varela Emilio Rafael,et al.  Use of simulated and real data to identify heterogeneity domains in scale-divergent forest landscapes , 2009 .

[69]  B Burkhard,et al.  Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[70]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[71]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scale and ecosystem services: how do observation, management, and analysis shift with scale—lessons from Québec , 2016 .

[72]  K. Gaston,et al.  Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities , 2009 .

[73]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[74]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[75]  B. Voigt,et al.  From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments , 2014 .

[76]  J. Ord,et al.  Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application , 2010 .