Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations

INTRODUCTION The relationship between participant motion, demographic variables and MRI-derived morphometric estimates was investigated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia and healthy controls. Participant motion was estimated using resting state fMRI and used as a proxy measure for motion during T1w MRI acquired in the same session. Analyses were carried out in scans qualitatively assessed as free from motion-related artifact. METHODS Whole brain T1-weighted MRI and resting state fMRI acquisitions from the ABIDE, ADHD-200 and COBRE databases were included in our analyses. Motion was estimated using coregistration of sequential resting state volumes. We investigated if motion is related to diagnosis, age and gender, and scanning site. We further determined if there is a relationship between participant motion and cortical thickness, contrast, and volumetric estimates. RESULTS 2141 participants were included in our analyses. Participant motion was higher in all clinical groups compared with healthy controls. Younger (age<20years) and older (age>40years) people move more than individuals aged 20-40years. Increased motion is associated with reduced average cortical thickness (-0.014mm thickness per mm motion, p=0.0014) and cortical contrast (0.77% contrast reduction per mm motion, p=2.16×10(-9)) in scans that have been qualitatively assessed as free from motion artifact. Volumetric estimates were also associated with motion, however the relationships were generally weaker than cortical thickness and contrast and were dependent on the segmentation method used. CONCLUSIONS Participant motion is increased in clinical groups and is systematically associated with morphometric estimates. These findings indicate that accounting for participant motion may be important for improving the statistical validity of morphometric studies.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Graeme D. Jackson,et al.  Multi-site voxel-based morphometry: Methods and a feasibility demonstration with childhood absence epilepsy , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[4]  B A Ardekani,et al.  Corpus Callosum Area and Brain Volume in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Quantitative Analysis of Structural MRI from the ABIDE Database , 2015, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[5]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  An evaluation of prospective motion correction (PMC) for high resolution quantitative MRI , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: A review , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Graeme D. Jackson,et al.  Constructing Carbon Fiber Motion-Detection Loops for Simultaneous EEG–fMRI , 2015, Front. Neurol..

[15]  M. Milham,et al.  The ADHD-200 Consortium: A Model to Advance the Translational Potential of Neuroimaging in Clinical Neuroscience , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Through Thick and Thin: a Need to Reconcile Contradictory Results on Trajectories in Human Cortical Development , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Arno Klein,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements , 2014, NeuroImage.

[18]  Cedric E. Ginestet ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2011 .

[19]  Dan Rettmann,et al.  PROMO: Real‐time prospective motion correction in MRI using image‐based tracking , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange: Towards Large-Scale Evaluation of the Intrinsic Brain Architecture in Autism , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.

[21]  Feng Gao,et al.  Retrospective motion correction protocol for high‐resolution anatomical MRI , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[22]  A. Snyder,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[25]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Registration based cortical thickness measurement , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates , 2015, NeuroImage.