Teams and management control systems : a synthesis of three organizational development approaches

Purpose – This paper applies organizational development (OD) process-cultural and structural change strategies to synthesize Etzioni’s three approaches to power and compliance: normative, coercive and remunerative to study the management control systems of teams in organizations. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses library-archives research. Findings – OD’s process and structural differences have affected team members’ commitment and operating performance in these three control systems. Advances in information technology have introduced new forms of normative: surveillance control. Research limitations/implications – If MCS are viewed as adaptive systems, the design and implementation of MCS center on identifying those contingent OD process and structural conditions that support team management in these three control systems. Originality/value – The management control literature has not applied Etzioni’s basis of power and compliance typologies to study the administrative control of teams. This paper fills this research gap by synthesizing and integrating the OD and MCS literature.

[1]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[2]  S. Coopman,et al.  Democracy, Performance, and Outcomes in Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams , 2001 .

[3]  Calvin Morrill,et al.  Conflict Management, Honor, and Organizational Change , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  M A Bell,et al.  Hospital uses team approach to improve processes, reduce costs. , 1998, AORN journal.

[5]  G. Grisetti,et al.  Further Reading , 1984, IEEE Spectrum.

[6]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996 .

[7]  James R. Barker,et al.  The Discipline of Teamwork: Participation and Concertive Control , 1999 .

[8]  Jr. James R. Zetka,et al.  The Technological Foundations of Task-Coordinating Structures in New Work Organizations , 1998 .

[9]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control. , 1998 .

[10]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[11]  Thomas W. Scott,et al.  Performance measurement and managerial teams , 1999 .

[12]  Susan F. Haka,et al.  Cost System and Incentive Structure Effects on Innovation, Efficiency and Profitability in Teams , 1999 .

[13]  Seleshi Sisaye,et al.  PROCESS INNOVATION AND ADAPTIVE INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE STRATEGIES IN MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS: ACTIVITY BASED COSTING AS ADMINISTRATIVE INNOVATION , 2003 .

[14]  Amitai Etzioni A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates , 1975 .

[15]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Powering up teams , 2000 .

[16]  G. Sewell The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .

[17]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The myth of the top management team. , 1997, Harvard business review.