Vibration produced by hand-held olive electrical harvesters

The paper reports the results of some laboratory and field tests aimed at assessing the acceleration levels transmitted to the hand-arm system by electric portable harvesters for olive. Four harvesting heads, different for shape and kinematic system, and five bars, different for diameter, length and material (aluminium and carbon fibre), were used in assembling eleven harvesters. The vibrations were measured in two points, next to the handgrips. The laboratory tests allowed the evaluation of the acceleration levels in standard controlled conditions, while the field tests allowed the assessing of the effects of the tree canopy with respect to the no load running. The laboratory tests showed that in reducing the vibration level plays a major role the kinematic system of the harvesting head and then the bar material. The classical flap-type harvester produced accelerations of around 20 m/s 2 , while by using a harvesting head with two parts in opposite movement, the accelerations were lowered to about 6 m/s 2 . The use of carbon fibres for the bars, besides the reduction in weight, produced also a reduction in acceleration (from 21 to 16 m/s 2 ). The field tests proved that the tree canopy had a negative effect on the vibrations transmitted to the hand-arm system, especially when the aluminium bar of small diameter was used.

[1]  Bülent Cakmak,et al.  Vibration and noise characteristics of flap type olive harvesters. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Virendra Tewari,et al.  Characteristics of vibration transmission in the hand–arm system and subjective response during field operation of a hand tractor , 2008 .

[3]  Simone Pascuzzi,et al.  Study of workers' exposures to vibrations produced by portable shakers 1 , 2008 .

[4]  Antonio Besa,et al.  Characterisation of the mechanical impedance of the human hand–arm system: The influence of vibration direction, hand–arm posture and muscle tension , 2007 .

[5]  Zulquernain Mallick.  Optimization of the operating parameters of a grass trimming machine. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  L Burström.  The influence of biodynamic factors on the mechanical impedance of the hand and arm , 1997, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[7]  R. Kester,et al.  The hand arm vibration syndrome: a review. , 1997, Cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass and mechanical impedance of the hand and the transmission of vibration to the fingers, hand, and arm , 2009 .

[9]  L. Fornaciari,et al.  Noise risk evaluation in electrical hand-held picking machines for olive harvesting. , 2008 .

[10]  W. Smutz,et al.  Vibration energy absorption (VEA) in human fingers-hand-arm system. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  Margarita Vergara,et al.  Hand-transmitted vibration in power tools: Accomplishment of standards and users’ perception , 2008 .

[12]  Roberto Deboli,et al.  The use of a capacitive sensor matrix to determine the grip forces applied to the olive hand held harvesters. , 2009 .

[13]  Pierre Marcotte,et al.  Influence of hand forces and handle size on power absorption of the human hand-arm exposed to zh-axis vibration , 2006 .

[14]  Michael J Griffin,et al.  Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of peripheral neurological disorders caused by hand-transmitted vibration , 2008, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[15]  D. E. Welcome,et al.  Correlations between biodynamic characteristics of human hand–arm system and the isolation effectiveness of anti-vibration gloves , 2005 .

[16]  Emanuele Cerruto,et al.  Vibrations Produced by Electric Shakers for Olive Harvesting , 2010 .

[17]  Danilo Monarca,et al.  Vibrations transmitted to hand-arm by the main chainsaw models sold in the Italian market , 2003 .

[18]  Virendra Tewari,et al.  Effect of vibration isolators in reduction of work stress during field operation of hand tractor , 2009 .