On the Importance of Polar Interactions for Complexes Containing Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

There is a growing recognition for the importance of proteins with large intrinsically disordered (ID) segments in cell signaling and regulation. ID segments in these proteins often harbor regions that mediate molecular recognition. Coupled folding and binding of the recognition regions has been proposed to confer high specificity to interactions involving ID segments. However, researchers recently questioned the origin of the interaction specificity of ID proteins because of the overrepresentation of hydrophobic residues in their interaction interfaces. Here, we focused on the role of polar and charged residues in interactions mediated by ID segments. Making use of the extended nature of most ID segments when in complex with globular proteins, we first identified large numbers of complexes between globular proteins and ID segments by using radius-of-gyration-based selection criteria. Consistent with previous studies, we found the interfaces of these complexes to be enriched in hydrophobic residues, and that these residues contribute significantly to the stability of the interaction interface. However, our analyses also show that polar interactions play a larger role in these complexes than in structured protein complexes. Computational alanine scanning and salt-bridge analysis indicate that interfaces in ID complexes are highly complementary with respect to electrostatics, more so than interfaces of globular proteins. Follow-up calculations of the electrostatic contributions to the free energy of binding uncovered significantly stronger Coulombic interactions in complexes harbouring ID segments than in structured protein complexes. However, they are counter-balanced by even higher polar-desolvation penalties. We propose that polar interactions are a key contributing factor to the observed high specificity of ID segment-mediated interactions.

[1]  M. Vihinen,et al.  Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions , 1994, Proteins.

[2]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  P A Kollman,et al.  Free energy calculations on dimer stability of the HIV protease using molecular dynamics and a continuum solvent model. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Weihong Zhang,et al.  Residual Structures, Conformational Fluctuations, and Electrostatic Interactions in the Synergistic Folding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Michael Feig,et al.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[6]  A. Shrake,et al.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  N. Grishin,et al.  Structural classification of small, disulfide-rich protein domains. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  Christus,et al.  A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of Two Proteins , 2022 .

[10]  István Simon,et al.  Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  István Simon,et al.  The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server , 2001, Bioinform..

[12]  Axel T Brunger,et al.  Structure and function of SNARE and SNARE-interacting proteins , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[13]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  Prediction of Protein Binding Regions in Disordered Proteins , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  B Tidor,et al.  Effects of salt bridges on protein structure and design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  H. Dyson,et al.  The RelA nuclear localization signal folds upon binding to IκBα. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  A. McCoy,et al.  Electrostatic complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  Per Jemth,et al.  Fast Association and Slow Transitions in the Interaction between Two Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domains* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  B. Rost Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[25]  M. Stewart,et al.  Nup50/Npap60 function in nuclear protein import complex disassembly and importin recycling , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Zoran Obradovic,et al.  DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..

[28]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins , 2003, Proteins.

[29]  L. Serrano,et al.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Denise Gorse,et al.  Morphological aspects of oligomeric protein structures. , 2005, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[31]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[32]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  3D Complex: A Structural Classification of Protein Complexes , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  M. Babu,et al.  The rules of disorder or why disorder rules. , 2009, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[35]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[36]  G. Rose,et al.  Reassessing random-coil statistics in unfolded proteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[38]  V. Uversky Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2014 .

[39]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[40]  Barry Honig,et al.  On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Urs Haberthür,et al.  FACTS: Fast analytical continuum treatment of solvation , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[42]  B. Matthews Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[43]  M. Roussel,et al.  Intrinsic disorder mediates the diverse regulatory functions of the Cdk inhibitor p21 , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[44]  P. Tompa The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins , 2005, FEBS letters.

[45]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[46]  Jon M. Kornhauser,et al.  Magnitude of the CREB-Dependent Transcriptional Response Is Determined by the Strength of the Interaction between the Kinase-Inducible Domain of CREB and the KIX Domain of CREB-Binding Protein , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[47]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Electrostatic properties of protein-protein complexes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Rohit V Pappu,et al.  How is functional specificity achieved through disordered regions of proteins? , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[49]  J. Janin,et al.  Principles of protein-protein recognition from structure to thermodynamics. , 1995, Biochimie.

[50]  A K Dunker,et al.  Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[51]  H. Dyson,et al.  Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein , 2007, Nature.

[52]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  An electrostatic steering mechanism of Cdc42 recognition by Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[53]  John L Markley,et al.  Intrinsically disordered γ-subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase encodes functionally relevant transient secondary and tertiary structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Nir London,et al.  The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. , 2010, Structure.

[55]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[56]  Philip D. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent-kinase inibitor bound to the cyclin A–Cdk2 complex , 1996, Nature.

[57]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  J A McCammon,et al.  Computer simulation of protein-protein association kinetics: acetylcholinesterase-fasciculin. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  D. Chandler Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly , 2005, Nature.

[60]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  M. Gilson,et al.  Strength of Solvent-Exposed Salt-Bridges† , 1999 .

[62]  Fabio Polticelli,et al.  Structural determinants of trypsin affinity and specificity for cationic inhibitors , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[63]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Improved detection of overrepresentation of Gene-Ontology annotations with parent-child analysis , 2007, Bioinform..

[64]  J F Gibrat,et al.  Surprising similarities in structure comparison. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[65]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  István Simon,et al.  Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  T. Pawson,et al.  Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. , 2000, Genes & development.

[68]  B. Tidor,et al.  Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[69]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[70]  R. S. Spolar,et al.  Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. , 1994, Science.

[71]  P. Romero,et al.  Sequence complexity of disordered protein , 2001, Proteins.

[72]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[73]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[74]  François Stricher,et al.  The FoldX web server: an online force field , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[75]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper: Substantial contributions arise from intramolecular interactions enhanced on binding , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[76]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[77]  E. Levy A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[78]  Taehoon Kim,et al.  CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[79]  J Walshaw,et al.  Socket: a program for identifying and analysing coiled-coil motifs within protein structures. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[80]  C Chothia,et al.  Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[81]  Robert C. Holte,et al.  Cost-Sensitive Classifier Evaluation Using Cost Curves , 2008, PAKDD.

[82]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.