Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.

Thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination were obtained for ten synthetic English vowels patterned after a female talker. To estimate the resolution of the auditory system for these stimuli, thresholds were measured using well-trained subjects under minimal-stimulus-uncertainty procedures. Thresholds were estimated for both increments and decrements in formant frequency for the first and second formants. Reliable measurements of threshold were obtained for most formants tested, the exceptions occurring when a harmonic of the fundamental was aligned with the center frequency of the test formant. In these cases, unusually high thresholds were obtained from some subjects and asymmetrical thresholds were measured for increments versus decrements in formant frequency. Excluding those cases, thresholds for formant frequency, delta F, are best described as a piecewise-linear function of frequency which is constant at about 14 Hz in the F1 frequency region (< 800 Hz), and increases linearly in the F2 region. In the F2 region, the resolution for formant frequency is approximately 1.5%. The present thresholds are similar to previous estimates in the F1 region, but about a factor of three lower than those in the F2 region. Comparisons of these results to those for pure tones and for complex, nonspeech stimuli are discussed.

[1]  J. Flanagan.  A Difference Limen for Vowel Formant Frequency , 1955 .

[2]  J. Flanagan.  Estimates of the Maximum Precision Necessary in Quantizing Certain , 1957 .

[3]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  B. Moore.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  G. Fant,et al.  Two-formant Models, Pitch and Vowel Perception , 1975 .

[6]  Paul Mermelstein,et al.  Difference limens for formant frequencies of steady‐state and consonant‐bound vowels , 1976 .

[7]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. Lieberman,et al.  Fundamental frequency and vowel perception , 1981 .

[9]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical-band spectra: A first step , 1982, ICASSP.

[10]  M R Leek,et al.  Learning to detect auditory pattern components. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D M Green,et al.  Auditory profile analysis of irregular sound spectra. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. Hermansky,et al.  An efficient speaker-independent automatic speech recognition by simulation of some properties of human auditory perception , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  C S Watson,et al.  Individual differences in auditory capabilities. I. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M F Dorman,et al.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  C S Watson,et al.  Auditory temporal acuity in relation to category boundaries; speech and nonspeech stimuli. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. Zurek,et al.  Resonance-frequency discrimination. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C. Turner,et al.  Pure-tone increment detection in harmonic and inharmonic backgrounds. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D Kewley-Port.  Detection thresholds for isolated vowels. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. Sinnott,et al.  Differential sensitivity to vowel continua in Old World monkeys (Macaca) and humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.