Design and virtual evaluation of a customized surface-guided knee implant

Although total knee arthroplasty is generally a successful operation, many studies have shown that it results in significant alterations in the kinematics of the joint, which cause limitations in performing the activities of daily living. This study aimed to define the design features for a customized surface-guided total knee replacement and to evaluate the kinematic outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging data of the knee joint are used to generate the design features as they relate to the functionality of the implant. The motion is guided by considering a partial ball and socket configuration on the medial condyle and varying radii of curvature on the lateral articulating surface. A virtual simulation of the behavior of the surface-guided total knee replacement was performed to investigate the motion patterns of this total knee replacement under gait and squatting loading conditions. Results of the virtual simulation show that flexion and extension of the knee make the center of the lateral condyle move more naturally in the posterior and anterior directions, in comparison to the center of the medial condyle. Such guidance is achieved as a result of the novel customized designed contact between the articulating surfaces. The proposed customized surface-guided total knee replacement provides patterns of motion close to the expected more natural target, not only during a gait cycle but also as the knee flexes to higher degrees during squatting. Major design features include location and orientation of the flexion and pivoting axes, the trace of the contact points on the tibia, and the radii of the guiding arcs on the lateral condyle.

[1]  P. Parizel,et al.  A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  U. Wyss,et al.  Tibiofemoral joint contact forces and knee kinematics during squatting. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[3]  D. Carpanen,et al.  Development and validation of a computational model of the knee joint for the evaluation of surgical treatments for osteoarthritis , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[4]  Jianhua Shen,et al.  Cruciate-retaining vs posterior-substituting inserts in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome comparison. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Standardized Loads Acting in Knee Implants , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Ganesh Thiagarajan,et al.  A multibody knee model with discrete cartilage prediction of tibio-femoral contact mechanics , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[7]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1991, Journal of Biomechanics.

[8]  Stephen Burnett,et al.  Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  Robert B. Bourne,et al.  AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE KNEE SOCIETY Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not ? , 2009 .

[10]  D. Bae,et al.  Clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot prosthesis a comparative study between the cruciate retaining and sacrificing. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee , 2000 .

[12]  Van den Heever,et al.  Development of patient-specific knee joint prostheses for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) , 2011 .

[13]  S A Banks,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic knee kinematics during squatting. , 2011, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  G. Bannister,et al.  Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  Lorin P Maletsky,et al.  Computational modelling of a total knee prosthetic loaded in a dynamic knee simulator. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  V. Spitzer,et al.  Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  Robert B. Bourne,et al.  Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. , 2008, The Knee.

[18]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Does the femur roll-back with flexion? , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  Toyohiko Hayashi,et al.  The effect of geometry of the tibial polyethylene insert on the tibiofemoral contact kinematics in Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[20]  Tsung-Yuan Tsai,et al.  In vivo kinematics of the knee during weight bearing high flexion. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  M. Cross,et al.  A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[23]  Kevin A. Dodd,et al.  Computational Knee Ligament Modeling Using Experimentally Determined Zero-Load Lengths , 2012, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[24]  Shantanu Patil,et al.  In vivo knee moments and shear after total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Satoshi Hamai,et al.  In vivo knee kinematics during stair and deep flexion activities in patients with bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  Shahram Amiri,et al.  Conceptual Design for Condylar Guiding Features of a Total Knee Replacement , 2011 .

[27]  P S Walker,et al.  A new concept in guided motion total knee arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  Satoshi Hamai,et al.  In Vivo Healthy Knee Kinematics during Dynamic Full Flexion , 2012, BioMed research international.

[29]  T. Guess,et al.  A subject specific multibody model of the knee with menisci. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  Peter S Walker,et al.  Application of a novel design method for knee replacements to achieve normal mechanics. , 2014, The Knee.

[31]  Mohamed R. Mahfouz,et al.  In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis Of Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Replacements , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  O. Harrysson,et al.  Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study , 2007, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[33]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Unicompartmental Knee Resurfacing: Enlarged Tibio-Femoral Contact Area and Reduced Contact Stress Using Novel Patient-Derived Geometries , 2010, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[34]  J B Stiehl,et al.  Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  円山 茂樹 Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty , 2005 .

[36]  U. Wyss,et al.  Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[37]  V Pinskerova,et al.  The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  Takaharu Yamazaki,et al.  In vivo kinematic analysis of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[39]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  In Vivo Kinematics after a Cruciate-substituting TKA , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  Fang Liu,et al.  Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  M Beaugonin,et al.  Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[43]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[44]  J B Stiehl,et al.  Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[45]  P S Walker,et al.  Future directions in knee replacement , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[46]  P. Walker,et al.  Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[47]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Study , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  Jan Victor,et al.  A Comparative Study on the Biomechanics of the Native Human Knee Joint and Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2009 .