Parametric Study of 3-D Hydrocarbon Scramjet Engine with Cavity *

Numerical calculations were completed to simulate the physical processes occurring within scramjet combustor flow fields and to determine the effects of different fuel injection schemes on the overall scramjet combustion efficiency. The different arrangements are compared in terms of species-mixing efficiency and overall combustion optimization. The numerical approach solves the full 3-D Navier-Stokes equations supplemented with a chemical combustion model including a rate-controlled kinetic mechanism for the combustion of ethylene fuel and air. The kinetic model is comprised of 20 chemical reactions and 13 chemical species, specifically, C2H4 (ethylene), C2H2, O2, CO2, H2O, CO, H2, OH, H,NO,N,N2 and O. The chemical model is directly coupled with a two-equation k-w turbulence model. For all cases, gaseous ethylene fuel is injected into the scramjet combustor region. The location of the fuel injectors and the angle of the injector orifices are varied to determine the optimum injection scheme. The fuel injector locations include the combustor inlet region upstream of the cavity, the cavity floor, and locations on the cavity upstream step and the downstream ramp. The angles of the fuel port injection slots include combinations of parallel, 27 deg, and 90 deg to the airflow inside the cavity. All combustor configurations include a common single-cavity combustor system to provide flameholding and stabilization in a supersonic combustor environment. The mixing efficiencies predicted for 10 different injection configurations are compared. The comparative results indicate that the fuel injection configuration with opposing injector pairs located within the cavity on the step and the ramp are the most efficient, resulting in 73-percent combustion efficiency. The work documented in this paper is part of an ongoing research program initiated with the goal of providing information to aid in the understanding of physical processes that dominate the flow within cavities utilized as scramjet combustor flameholders.

[1]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Computational and experimental investigation of cavity flowfields , 1987 .

[2]  Houshang B. Ebrahimi,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Transient Jet-Interaction Phenomenology in a Supersonic Freestream , 2000 .

[3]  Kenneth J. Wilson,et al.  Effect of Flame-Holding Cavities on Supersonic-Combustion Performance , 2001 .

[4]  Y. Jeng,et al.  Numerical study of a supersonic open cavity flow and pressure oscillation control , 1995 .

[5]  S. Baek,et al.  Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection , 2004 .

[6]  J. P. Drummond,et al.  Supersonic flow over a rearward facing step with transverse nonreacting hydrogen injection , 1983 .

[7]  Ndaona Chokani,et al.  Hypersonic flow past open cavities , 1994 .

[8]  Donald P. Rizzetta,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Flow Over a Three-Dimensional Cavity , 1987 .

[9]  F. Billig,et al.  Experiments with a Cavity-Based Fuel Injector for Scramjet Applications , 1999 .

[10]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow , 2004 .

[11]  Ndaona Chokani,et al.  Navier-Stokes study of supersonic cavity flowfield with passive control , 1992 .

[12]  K. K. Ahuja,et al.  Prediction and measurement of flows over cavities - A survey , 1987 .

[13]  F. Billig,et al.  Supersonic Combustion Experiments with a Cavity-Based Fuel Injector (Postprint) , 2001 .

[14]  D.V. Gaitonde,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Scramjet Flowpath with Innovative Inlets , 2007, 2009 DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference.

[15]  R. Hanson,et al.  Cavity flameholders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets - Review and experimental study , 1998 .

[16]  M. Franke,et al.  Effect of geometry on open cavity flow-induced pressure oscillations , 1975 .

[17]  N. Chokani,et al.  Suppression of pressure oscillations in an open cavity by passive pneumatic control , 1991 .

[18]  S. O’Byrne,et al.  Supersonic Combustion of Hydrogen Fuel Injection Locations in a Cavity-Based Combustor , 2008 .

[19]  W. L. Hankey,et al.  Analyses of Pressure Oscillations in an Open Cavity , 1980 .

[20]  R. A. White,et al.  Drag of rectangular cavities in supersonic and transonic flow including the effects of cavity resonance , 1970 .

[21]  Houshang B. Ebrahimi,et al.  Validation Database for Propulsion Computational Fluid Dynamics , 1997 .

[22]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview , 2001 .

[23]  Chung-Jen Tam,et al.  Analysis of unsteady cavity flows for scramjet applications , 2000 .

[24]  Tarun Mathur,et al.  Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors , 2001 .