Research Article Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice

Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education, North CarolinaState University, Campus Box 7801, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7801Received 12 August 2010; Accepted 2 August 2012Abstract: Current research indicates that student engagement in scientific argumentation can fostera better understanding of the concepts and the processes of science. Yet opportunities for students toparticipate in authentic argumentation inside the science classroom are rare. There also is little knownabout science teachers’ understandings of argumentation, their ability to participate in this complexpractice, or their views about using argumentation as part of the teaching and learning of science. In thisstudy, the researchers used a cognitive appraisal interview to examine how 30 secondary science teach-ers evaluate alternative explanations, generate an argument to support a specific explanation, and investi-gate their views about engaging students in argumentation. The analysis of the teachers’ comments andactions during the interview indicates that these teachers relied primarily on their prior content knowl-edge to evaluate the validity of an explanation rather than using available data. Although some of theteachers included data and reasoning in their arguments, most of the teachers crafted an argument thatsimply expanded on a chosen explanation but provided no real support for it. The teachers also men-tioned multiple barriers to the integration of argumentation into the teaching and learning of science,primarily related to their perceptions of students’ ability levels, even though all of these teachers viewedargumentation as a way to help students understand science. 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res SciTeach 49: 1122–1148, 2012Keywords: argumentation; science teachers; cognitive appraisal interview

[1]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Personally‐Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation , 2007 .

[2]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .

[3]  James W. Stigler,et al.  Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-011. , 2006 .

[4]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .

[5]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[6]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation , 2009 .

[7]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions , 2008 .

[8]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argument , 2002 .

[9]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[10]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools , 2002 .

[11]  Victor Sampson,et al.  Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study , 2011 .

[12]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[13]  E. McColl Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  B. Crawford Learning to Teach Science as Inquiry in the Rough and Tumble of Practice , 2007 .

[15]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation. , 2009 .

[16]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts , 2010 .

[17]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .

[18]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Decision Making in the Practical Domain: A Model of Practical Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[19]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse , 1999 .

[20]  Margaret R. Blanchard,et al.  No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry‐based research experience for teachers , 2009 .

[21]  Carolyn W. Keys,et al.  Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .

[22]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  From Beliefs to Actions: The Beliefs and Actions of Teachers Implementing Change , 2002 .

[23]  Ron Henderson,et al.  An Examination of Four User-Based Software Evaluation Methods , 1995, Interact. Comput..

[24]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[25]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  A Comparison of the Collaborative Scientific Argumentation Practices of Two High and Two Low Performing Groups , 2011 .

[26]  William S. Carlsen,et al.  Effects of New Biology Teachers' Subject-Matter Knowledge on Curricular Planning. , 1991 .

[27]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[28]  Ann S. Rosebery,et al.  Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings from Language Minority Classrooms. , 1992 .

[29]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[30]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations , 2005 .

[31]  J. A. Hatch,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings , 2002 .

[32]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .

[33]  D. Walton Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[34]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation , 2002 .

[35]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Computer Support for Collaborative and Argumentative Writing , 2002 .

[36]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Ready, Set, SCIENCE!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms , 2007 .

[37]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .

[38]  Julie Gess-Newsome,et al.  Overcoming the Paradox of Change without Difference: A Model of Change in the Arena of Fundamental School Reform , 2002 .

[39]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Assessing Teachers' Beliefs about Their Science Teaching Context , 2000 .

[40]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[41]  Ron Henderson,et al.  A comparison of the four prominent user-based methods for evaluating the usability of computer software , 1995 .

[42]  W. Sandoval Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .

[43]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[44]  Adrienne A. Smith 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION , 2013 .

[45]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Beliefs About Science: How Does Science Instruction Contribute? , 2001 .

[46]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[47]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .

[48]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[49]  Jennifer L. Cartier,et al.  Developing Understanding Through Model-Based Inquiry , 2007 .

[50]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument , 2001 .

[51]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[52]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[53]  Leonard A. Annetta,et al.  Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction , 2010 .

[54]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[55]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[56]  W. Harwood,et al.  The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices , 2007 .