Selecting chemical and ecotoxicological test batteries for risk assessment of trace element-contaminated soils (phyto)managed by gentle remediation options (GRO).

During the past decades a number of field trials with gentle remediation options (GRO) have been established on trace element (TE) contaminated sites throughout Europe. Each research group selects different methods to assess the remediation success making it difficult to compare efficacy between various sites and treatments. This study aimed at selecting a minimum risk assessment battery combining chemical and ecotoxicological assays for assessing and comparing the effectiveness of GRO implemented in seven European case studies. Two test batteries were pre-selected; a chemical one for quantifying TE exposure in untreated soils and GRO-managed soils and a biological one for characterizing soil functionality and ecotoxicity. Soil samples from field studies representing one of the main GROs (phytoextraction in Belgium, Sweden, Germany and Switzerland, aided phytoextraction in France, and aided phytostabilization or in situ stabilization/phytoexclusion in Poland, France and Austria) were collected and assessed using the selected test batteries. The best correlations were obtained between NH4NO3-extractable, followed by NaNO3-extractable TE and the ecotoxicological responses. Biometrical parameters and biomarkers of dwarf beans were the most responsive indicators for the soil treatments and changes in soil TE exposures. Plant growth was inhibited at the higher extractable TE concentrations, while plant stress enzyme activities increased with the higher TE extractability. Based on these results, a minimum risk assessment battery to compare/biomonitor the sites phytomanaged by GROs might consist of the NH4NO3 extraction and the bean Plantox test including the stress enzyme activities.

[1]  M. Mench,et al.  Phenotypic seedling responses of a metal-tolerant mutant line of sunflower growing on a Cu-contaminated soil series: potential uses for biomonitoring of Cu exposure and phytoremediation , 2014, Plant and Soil.

[2]  G. McCarty,et al.  Biological aspects of metal waste reclamation with biosolids. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[3]  G. Renella,et al.  Availability and speciation of cadmium added to a calcareous soil under various managements , 2004 .

[4]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Cadmium toxicity effects on growth, mineral and chlorophyll contents, and activities of stress related enzymes in young maize plants (Zea mays L.) , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[5]  A. Prüess.  Action values for mobile (NH4NO3-extractable) trace elements in soils based on the German national standard DIN 19730 , 1997 .

[6]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Copper toxicity in young maize (Zea mays L.) plants: effects on growth, mineral and chlorophyll contents, and enzyme activities , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[7]  Clémence Bes.  Phytoremédiation des sols d’un site de traitement du bois contaminés par le cuivre , 2008 .

[8]  J. Schwitzguébel,et al.  Metal accumulation and response of antioxidant enzymes in seedlings and adult sunflower mutants with , 2012 .

[9]  H. N. Farrer,et al.  Determination of total and leachable arsenic and selenium in soils by continuous hydride generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , 1994 .

[10]  Suzy Van Sanden,et al.  Cadmium-induced transcriptional and enzymatic alterations related to oxidative stress , 2008 .

[11]  P. Williams,et al.  Tolerance of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to pH, Salinity, and Hardness in Aquatic Media , 1997, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[12]  Michel Mench,et al.  Evaluation of hydroxyapatite as a metal immobilizing soil additive for the remediation of polluted soils. Part 1. Influence of hydroxyapatite on metal exchangeability in soil, plant growth and plant metal accumulation , 1999 .

[13]  M. M. Abreu,et al.  Metal (Al, Mn, Pb and Zn) soils extractable reagents for available fraction assessment: Comparison using plants, and dry and moist soils from the Braçal abandoned lead mine area, Portugal , 2012 .

[14]  Anne Fairbrother,et al.  Efforts to standardize wildlife toxicity values remain unrealized. , 2013, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[15]  F. Van Assche,et al.  Induction of enzyme capacity in plants as a result of heavy metal toxicity: dose-response relations in Phaseolus vulgaris L., treated with zinc and cadmium. , 1988, Environmental pollution.

[16]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Induction of oxidative stress and antioxidative mechanisms in Phaseolus vulgaris after Cd application. , 2005, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[17]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Terrestrial biotic ligand model. 2. Application to Ni and Cu toxicities to plants, invertebrates, and microbes in soil. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  J Vangronsveld,et al.  Reclamation of a bare industrial area contaminated by non-ferrous metals: in situ metal immobilization and revegetation. , 1995, Environmental pollution.

[19]  R. Samson,et al.  Phytoavailability assessment of heavy metals in soils by single extractions and accumulation by Phaseolus vulgaris , 2007 .

[20]  Ioannis Dimitriou,et al.  Treatment of landfill leachate by irrigation of willow coppice--plant response and treatment efficiency. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[21]  J. Römbke,et al.  Assessing the toxicity of contaminated soils using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as test organism. , 2009, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[22]  M. Mench,et al.  Copper Phytoextraction in Tandem with Oilseed Production Using Commercial Cultivars and Mutant Lines of Sunflower , 2011, International journal of phytoremediation.

[23]  J. M. Soriano-Disla,et al.  Evaluation of single chemical extractants for the prediction of heavy metal uptake by barley in soils amended with polluted sewage sludge , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[24]  P. Kille,et al.  Towards an integrative soil health assessment strategy: a three tier (integrative biomarker response) approach with Eisenia fetida applied to soils subjected to chronic metal pollution. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Capacity of soil amendments in lowering the phytoavailability of sludge-borne zinc , 2000 .

[26]  S. Cummings.  Bioremediation : methods and protocols , 2010 .

[27]  P. Pandard,et al.  How terrestrial snails can be used in risk assessment of soils , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[28]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  Toxic Effects of Metals , 2008 .

[29]  Jaco Vangronsveld,et al.  Short Rotation Coppice Culture of Willows and Poplars as Energy Crops on Metal Contaminated Agricultural Soils , 2011, International journal of phytoremediation.

[30]  S. M. H. Rizvi,et al.  Allelopathic effects of nicotine on maize I. Its possible importance in crop rotation , 1989, Plant and Soil.

[31]  Guy Mercier,et al.  Metal-Contaminated Soils: Remediation Practices and Treatment Technologies , 2008 .

[32]  S. McGrath,et al.  A new method to measure effective soil solution concentration predicts copper availability to plants. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  M. H. Gerzabek,et al.  Immobilising of Cd, Pb, and Zn contaminated arable soils close to a former Pb/Zn smelter: a field study in Austria over 5 years , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[34]  M. McBride,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TESTS FOR EXTRACTABLE COPPER AND ZINC IN METAL-SPIKED AND FIELD-CONTAMINATED SOIL , 2009 .

[35]  M. Gerzabek,et al.  Remediation of contaminated agricultural soils near a former Pb/Zn smelter in Austria: batch, pot and field experiments. , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[36]  T. Sterckeman,et al.  Trace Metal Speciation in Three Unbuffered Salt Solutions Used to Assess their Bioavailability in Soil , 1998 .

[37]  Windy A. Boyd,et al.  Availability of metals to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Toxicity based on total concentrations in soil and extracted fractions , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[38]  S. McGrath,et al.  Copper uptake by Elsholtzia splendens and Silene vulgaris and assessment of copper phytoavailability in contaminated soils. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[39]  K. C. Thompson,et al.  Low-cost ecotoxicity testing of environmental samples using microbiotests for potential implementation of the Water Framework Directive , 2007 .

[40]  M. McLaughlin,et al.  Soil testing for heavy metals , 2000 .

[41]  M. Durand,et al.  Use of ecotoxicity test and ecoscores to improve the management of polluted soils: case of a secondary lead smelter plant. , 2013, Journal of hazardous materials.

[42]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  S. Gupta,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Extraction Media and Their Suitability in a Simple Model to Predict the Biological Relevance of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Contaminated Soils , 1993 .

[44]  J. Dean.  Heavy metal bioavailability and bioaccessibility in soil. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[45]  R. Boluda,et al.  Soil plate bioassay: an effective method to determine ecotoxicological risks. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[46]  Jaco Vangronsveld,et al.  Rehabilitation studies on an old non-ferrous waste dumping ground: effects of revegetation and metal immobilization by beringite , 1995 .

[47]  Ingo Müller,et al.  Developing decision support tools for the selection of "gentle" remediation approaches. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  D. Lelie,et al.  Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field , 2009, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[49]  J Vangronsveld,et al.  Reclamation of a bare industrial area contaminated by non-ferrous metals: physico-chemical and biological evaluation of the durability of soil treatment and revegetation. , 1996, Environmental pollution.

[50]  H. Clijsters,et al.  Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants , 1990 .

[51]  Jean-Paul Schwitzguébel,et al.  Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: outcomes, assessment and outlook from COST Action 859 , 2010 .

[52]  Jaco Vangronsveld,et al.  Rehabilitation of the nematode fauna in a phytostabilized, heavily zinc-contaminated, sandy soil , 2004 .

[53]  A. Garcia-sanchez,et al.  Evaluation of various chemical extraction methods to estimate plant-available arsenic in mine soils. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[54]  P. Pandard,et al.  Improvement of the Caenorhabditis elegans growth and reproduction test to assess the ecotoxicity of soils and complex matrices , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.