Measuring IP Address Fragmentation from BGP Routing Dynamics

Address Fragmentation plays a key role in the exponential growth of DFZ routing table, known as the scalability problem of current Internet. In this paper, we measure the severity of address fragmentation, and try to figure out the relationship between Prefix-Distance and Network-Distance of current Internet by taking Geographic-Distance as an approximation of Network-Distance. We focus our measurement on the prefixes with relatively small Geographic-Distance, and get Prefix Groups from BGP routing dynamics. This method reduces the number of active probes required in active measurement, and results a more detailed prefixes’ distribution analysis. We find out that there are two extreme allocations of IP address blocks in current Internet. Some of the blocks with small Geographic-Distances have small Prefix-Distances, while others with small Geographic-Distances have rather big Prefix-Distances. This is the direct reason of the BGP routing table’s inflation. We further conclude that by reallocating IP address blocks according to geography, we could significantly reduce the size of the global routing tables.

[1]  Songwu Lu,et al.  IPv4 address allocation and the BGP routing table evolution , 2005, CCRV.

[2]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Inferring AS-level Internet topology from router-level path traces , 2001, SPIE ITCom.

[3]  Yakov Rekhter,et al.  A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) , 1994, RFC.

[4]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Predicting Internet network distance with coordinates-based approaches , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[5]  Min Tang,et al.  A three-step dynamic threshold method to cluster BGP updates into routing events , 2009, 2009 International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems.

[6]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  On routing table growth , 2002, CCRV.

[7]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing , 2007, RFC.

[8]  Nick Feamster,et al.  Topology inference from BGP routing dynamics , 2002, IMW '02.

[9]  TowsleyDon,et al.  On characterizing BGP routing table growth , 2004 .

[10]  Nick Feamster,et al.  Geographic locality of IP prefixes , 2005, IMC '05.

[11]  Susan Hares,et al.  A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) , 1994, RFC.

[12]  Paul Francis,et al.  An architecture for a global Internet host distance estimation service , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).

[13]  Arun Venkataramani,et al.  A structural approach to latency prediction , 2006, IMC '06.

[14]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Geographically Informed Inter-Domain Routing , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

[15]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  On characterizing BGP routing table growth , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[16]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  On the curvature of the Internet and its usage for overlay construction and distance estimation , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.