In small-pore zeolite catalysts, where the size of the pores is limited by eight-ring windows, aromatic hydrocarbon pool molecules that are formed inside the zeolite during the Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) process cannot exit the pores and are retained inside the catalyst. Hydrocarbon species whose size is comparable to the size of the zeolite cage can cause the zeolite lattice to expand during the MTO process. In this work, the formation of retained hydrocarbon pool species during MTO at a reaction temperature of 400 °C was followed using operando UV–vis spectroscopy. During the same experiment, using operando X-ray Diffraction (XRD), the expansion of the zeolite framework was assessed, and the activity of the catalyst was measured using online gas chromatography (GC). Three different small-pore zeolite frameworks, i.e., CHA, DDR, and LEV, were compared. It was shown using operando XRD that the formation of retained aromatic species causes the zeolite lattice of all three frameworks to expand. Because of the differences in the zeolite framework dimensions, the nature of the retained hydrocarbons as measured by operando UV–vis spectroscopy is different for each of the three zeolite frameworks. Consequently, the magnitude and direction of the zeolite lattice expansion as measured by operando XRD also depends on the specific combination of the hydrocarbon species and the zeolite framework. The catalyst with the CHA framework, i.e., H-SSZ-13, showed the biggest expansion: 0.9% in the direction along the c-axis of the zeolite lattice. For all three zeolite frameworks, based on the combination of operando XRD and operando UV–vis spectroscopy, the hydrocarbon species that are likely to cause the expansion of the zeolite cages are presented; methylated naphthalene and pyrene in CHA, 1-methylnaphthalene and phenalene in DDR, and methylated benzene and naphthalene in LEV. Filling of the zeolite cages and, as a consequence, the zeolite lattice expansion causes the deactivation of these small-pore zeolite catalysts during the MTO process.
[1]
F. Kapteijn,et al.
Insights into the Activity and Deactivation of the Methanol-to-Olefins Process over Different Small-Pore Zeolites As Studied with Operando UV–vis Spectroscopy
,
2017,
ACS catalysis.
[2]
Abdullah M. Asiri,et al.
Influence of the Reaction Temperature on the Nature of the Active and Deactivating Species During Methanol-to-Olefins Conversion over H-SAPO-34
,
2015,
ACS catalysis.
[3]
B. Weckhuysen,et al.
Combined Operando X‐ray Diffraction/Raman Spectroscopy of Catalytic Solids in the Laboratory: The Co/TiO2 Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Catalyst Showcase
,
2016,
ChemCatChem.
[4]
K. Lillerud,et al.
The formation and degradation of active species during methanol conversion over protonated zeotype catalysts.
,
2015,
Chemical Society reviews.
[5]
Marco Di Michiel,et al.
Watching the methanol-to-olefin process with time- and space-resolved high-energy operando X-ray diffraction.
,
2012,
Angewandte Chemie.
[6]
K. Lillerud,et al.
Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity.
,
2012,
Angewandte Chemie.
[7]
Unni Olsbye,et al.
Space- and time-resolved in-situ spectroscopy on the coke formation in molecular sieves: methanol-to-olefin conversion over H-ZSM-5 and H-SAPO-34.
,
2008,
Chemistry.
[8]
Weiguo Song,et al.
The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis.
,
2003,
Accounts of chemical research.