“What Is Truth?” Negotiating Christian Convert Asylum Seekers’ Credibility
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Conrad Krannich. Recht macht Religion , 2020 .
[2] Natalia Paszkiewicz,et al. What’s missing from legal geography and materialist studies of law? Absence and the assembling of asylum appeal hearings in Europe , 2020, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.
[3] Susanne Stadlbauer. Between Secrecy and Transparency: Conversions to Protestantism Among Iranian Refugees in Germany , 2019, Entangled Religions.
[4] A. Good,et al. Asylum Determination in Europe , 2018 .
[5] Carolina Kobelinsky. The “Inner Belief” of French Asylum Judges , 2018, Asylum Determination in Europe.
[6] Zachary Whyte,et al. Narrating Asylum in Camp and at Court , 2018, Asylum Determination in Europe.
[7] Benjamin Pernak. Richter als »Religionswächter«? Zur gerichtlichen Überprüfbarkeit eines Glaubenswechsels: Asylverfahren von Konvertiten in Deutschland und Großbritannien im Vergleich , 2018 .
[8] R. Cristofori,et al. ‘The Complexity of Religion and the Definition of “Religion” in International Law’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, pp. 189-215 , 2016 .
[9] E. Wilson,et al. The Refugee Crisis and Religion: Secularism, Security and Hospitality in Question , 2016 .
[10] M. Hodes,et al. Telling the story: A psychological review on assessing adolescents’ asylum claims. , 2016 .
[11] Carolina Kobelinsky. Judging Intimacies at the French Court of Asylum , 2015 .
[12] S. Turner,et al. Untested assumptions: psychological research and credibility assessment in legal decision-making , 2015, European journal of psychotraumatology.
[13] Simone Fox,et al. The importance of looking credible: the impact of the behavioural sequelae of post-traumatic stress disorder on the credibility of asylum seekers , 2015 .
[14] A. Good,et al. Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France , 2014 .
[15] Carolina Kobelinsky. A matter of value. Exploring what underlies adjudication in the French Court of Asylum , 2014 .
[16] T. Johansson,et al. Credibility Assessments as 'Normative Leakage': Asylum Applications, Gender and Class , 2013 .
[17] S. Turner,et al. What do we know so far about emotion and refugee law? , 2013 .
[18] T. Maroney. Judges and their emotions , 2013 .
[19] L. Jobson,et al. Just tell us what happened to you: autobiographical memory and seeking asylum , 2012 .
[20] Olga Jubany. Constructing truths in a culture of disbelief , 2011 .
[21] S. Turner,et al. What Assumptions about Human Behaviour Underlie Asylum Judgments , 2010 .
[22] C. Brewin,et al. Refugees' Experiences of Home Office Interviews: A Qualitative Study on the Disclosure of Sensitive Personal Information , 2010 .
[23] A. Good. Persecution for reasons of religion under the 1951 Refugee Convention , 2009 .
[24] G. Coffey. The Credibility of Credibility Evidence at the Refugee Review Tribunal , 2003 .
[25] Michael Kagan. Is Truth in the Eye of the Beholder? Objective Credibility Assessment in Refugee Status Determination , 2003 .
[26] L. Epstein,et al. The choices justices make , 1997 .
[27] D. O'leary. On the matter of value. , 1995, Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.