“What Is Truth?” Negotiating Christian Convert Asylum Seekers’ Credibility

The arrival of more than five million refugees in Europe since 2015 has led to increasing investigations into Europe’s management of multiculturalism and religious pluralism. Studies to date have chiefly focused on the integration of the cultural and religious “other,” but we take a different approach by analyzing asylum proceedings in Germany, based on conversions from Islam to Christianity. Negotiations of credibility of newly converted Christian asylum seekers help to show how European legal authorities conceive of their own historically Christian identity and their expectations of newcomers. We show how these negotiations are influenced by the power dynamics in the courts, understandings of cultural and religious contexts, and assumptions about conversion and Christianity. Our interdisciplinary approach provides insights into how European legal authorities navigate the challenge of cultural and religious others to Europe’s cultural cohesion, “values,” and secularism.

[1]  Conrad Krannich Recht macht Religion , 2020 .

[2]  Natalia Paszkiewicz,et al.  What’s missing from legal geography and materialist studies of law? Absence and the assembling of asylum appeal hearings in Europe , 2020, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

[3]  Susanne Stadlbauer Between Secrecy and Transparency: Conversions to Protestantism Among Iranian Refugees in Germany , 2019, Entangled Religions.

[4]  A. Good,et al.  Asylum Determination in Europe , 2018 .

[5]  Carolina Kobelinsky The “Inner Belief” of French Asylum Judges , 2018, Asylum Determination in Europe.

[6]  Zachary Whyte,et al.  Narrating Asylum in Camp and at Court , 2018, Asylum Determination in Europe.

[7]  Benjamin Pernak Richter als »Religionswächter«? Zur gerichtlichen Überprüfbarkeit eines Glaubenswechsels: Asylverfahren von Konvertiten in Deutschland und Großbritannien im Vergleich , 2018 .

[8]  R. Cristofori,et al.  ‘The Complexity of Religion and the Definition of “Religion” in International Law’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, pp. 189-215 , 2016 .

[9]  E. Wilson,et al.  The Refugee Crisis and Religion: Secularism, Security and Hospitality in Question , 2016 .

[10]  M. Hodes,et al.  Telling the story: A psychological review on assessing adolescents’ asylum claims. , 2016 .

[11]  Carolina Kobelinsky Judging Intimacies at the French Court of Asylum , 2015 .

[12]  S. Turner,et al.  Untested assumptions: psychological research and credibility assessment in legal decision-making , 2015, European journal of psychotraumatology.

[13]  Simone Fox,et al.  The importance of looking credible: the impact of the behavioural sequelae of post-traumatic stress disorder on the credibility of asylum seekers , 2015 .

[14]  A. Good,et al.  Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France , 2014 .

[15]  Carolina Kobelinsky A matter of value. Exploring what underlies adjudication in the French Court of Asylum , 2014 .

[16]  T. Johansson,et al.  Credibility Assessments as 'Normative Leakage': Asylum Applications, Gender and Class , 2013 .

[17]  S. Turner,et al.  What do we know so far about emotion and refugee law? , 2013 .

[18]  T. Maroney Judges and their emotions , 2013 .

[19]  L. Jobson,et al.  Just tell us what happened to you: autobiographical memory and seeking asylum , 2012 .

[20]  Olga Jubany Constructing truths in a culture of disbelief , 2011 .

[21]  S. Turner,et al.  What Assumptions about Human Behaviour Underlie Asylum Judgments , 2010 .

[22]  C. Brewin,et al.  Refugees' Experiences of Home Office Interviews: A Qualitative Study on the Disclosure of Sensitive Personal Information , 2010 .

[23]  A. Good Persecution for reasons of religion under the 1951 Refugee Convention , 2009 .

[24]  G. Coffey The Credibility of Credibility Evidence at the Refugee Review Tribunal , 2003 .

[25]  Michael Kagan Is Truth in the Eye of the Beholder? Objective Credibility Assessment in Refugee Status Determination , 2003 .

[26]  L. Epstein,et al.  The choices justices make , 1997 .

[27]  D. O'leary On the matter of value. , 1995, Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.