General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments.

A general model of competitive and apparent competitive interactions in a spatially-variable environment is developed and analyzed to extend findings on coexistence in a temporally-variable environment to the spatial case and to elucidate new principles. In particular, coexistence mechanisms are divided into variation-dependent and variation-independent mechanisms with variation-dependent mechanisms including spatial generalizations of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect. Although directly analogous to the corresponding temporal mechanisms, these spatial mechanisms involve different life history traits which suggest that the spatial storage effect should arise more commonly than the temporal storage effect and spatial relative nonlinearity should arise less commonly than temporal relative nonlinearity. Additional mechanisms occur in the spatial case due to spatial covariance between the finite rate of increase of a local population and its local abundance, which has no clear temporal analogue. A limited analysis of these additional mechanisms shows that they have similar properties to the storage effect and relative nonlinearity and potentially may be considered as enlargements of the earlier mechanisms. The rate of increase of a species perturbed to low density is used to quantify coexistence. A general quadratic approximation, which is exact in some important cases, divides this rate of increase into contributions from the various mechanisms above and admits no other mechanisms, suggesting that opportunities for coexistence in a spatially-variable environment are fully characterized by these mechanisms within this general model. Three spatially-implicit models are analyzed as illustrations of the general findings and of techniques using small variance approximations. The contributions to coexistence of the various mechanisms are expressed in terms of simple interpretable formulae. These spatially-implicit models include a model of an annual plant community, a spatial multispecies version of the lottery model, and a multispecies model of an insect community competing for spatially-patchy and ephemeral food.

[1]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Dynamics of a metapopulation with space-limited subpopulations , 1986 .

[2]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[3]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species , 1997 .

[4]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice , 1997 .

[5]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Species coexistence by permanent spatial heterogeneity in a lottery model. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  M. Hassell,et al.  The Persistence of Host-Parasitoid Associations in Patchy Environments. II. Evaluation of Field Data , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[7]  A. Ives.  Covariance, coexistence and the population dynamics of two competitors using a patchy resource , 1988 .

[8]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[9]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[10]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Interactions Between Environment and Competition: How Fluctuations Mediate Coexistence and Competitive Exclusion , 1988 .

[11]  P. Chesson.  Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[12]  G. Hartvigsen.  Metapopulation biology: Ecology, genetics, and evolution , 1997 .

[13]  Toshiyuki Namba,et al.  Competitive Co-existence in a seasonally fluctuating environment , 1984 .

[14]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[15]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  7 – From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure: Some Consequences of Spatial Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[16]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The stabilizing effect of a random environment , 1982 .

[17]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[18]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Time scale of resource dynamics and coexistence through time partitioning , 1992 .

[19]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Interspecific competition among metapopulations with space-limited subpopulations , 1986 .

[20]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Geometry, heterogeneity and competition in variable environments , 1990 .

[21]  I. Noble,et al.  Dispersal, Variability, and Transient Niches: Species Coexistence in a Uniformly Variable Environment , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[22]  V. Hutson,et al.  Permanent coexistence in general models of three interacting species , 1985, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  A. Ives,et al.  Aggregation and the coexistence of competing parasitoid species. , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[24]  W. Ebenhoh.  Temporal organization in a multi-species model , 1992 .

[25]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[26]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[27]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[28]  John H. Lawton,et al.  The Ecological Consequences of Shared Natural Enemies , 1994 .

[29]  Claudia Neuhauser,et al.  An explicitly spatial version of the Lotka-Volterra model with interspecific competition , 1999 .

[30]  R. Holt.  From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure , 1997 .

[31]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models , 1989 .

[32]  S. Ellner,et al.  Convergence to stationary distributions in two-species stochastic competition models , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[34]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The Persistence of Host-Parasitoid Associations in Patchy Environments. I. A General Criterion , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[35]  S. Levin.  Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[36]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology , 1998 .

[37]  S. Levin.  Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[38]  P. Charlesworth,et al.  COMPETITION ON A DIVIDED AND EPHEMERAL RESOURCE , 1979 .

[39]  S. Pacala,et al.  Neighborhood Models of Plant Population Dynamics. I. Single-Species Models of Annuals , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Competition and Regional Coexistence , 1974 .

[41]  R. B. Root.  The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher , 1967 .

[42]  G. T. Vickers,et al.  A criterion for permanent coexistence of species, with an application to a two-prey one-predator system , 1983 .

[43]  B. Bolker,et al.  Using Moment Equations to Understand Stochastically Driven Spatial Pattern Formation in Ecological Systems , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[44]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[45]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Models for Spatially Distributed Populations: The Effect of Within-Patch Variability , 1981 .

[46]  Stephen W. Pacala,et al.  Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics 3. Models with spatial heterogeneity in the physical environment , 1987 .

[47]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[48]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[49]  V. Hutson,et al.  On a criterion for survival of species in models governed by difference equations , 1983 .

[50]  Mark Rees,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Competition and Spatial Heterogeneity on the Structure and Dynamics of a Four-Species Guild of Winter Annuals , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[51]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments: A Look at the Combined Effects of Different Sorts of Variability , 1985 .

[52]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Community consequences of life-history traits in a variable environment , 1988 .

[53]  Michael Turelli,et al.  Niche overlap and invasion of competitors in random environments I. Models without demographic stochasticity , 1981 .

[54]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: A Simulation Model , 1981 .

[55]  P. Abrams.  Variability in resource consumption rates and the coexistence of competing species , 1984 .

[56]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[57]  N. Shigesada.  Spatial Distribution of Rapidly Dispersing Animals in Heterogeneous Environments , 1984 .

[58]  R. McGehee,et al.  Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.