Do Implicit and Explicit Measures of the Sense of Agency Measure the Same Thing?

The sense of agency (SoA) refers to perceived causality of the self, i.e. the feeling of causing something to happen. The SoA has been probed using a variety of explicit and implicit measures. Explicit measures include rating scales and questionnaires. Implicit measures, which include sensory attenuation and temporal binding, use perceptual differences between self- and externally generated stimuli as measures of the SoA. In the present study, we investigated whether the different measures tap into the same self-attribution processes by determining whether individual differences on implicit and explicit measures of SoA are correlated. Participants performed tasks in which they triggered tones via key presses (operant condition) or passively listened to tones triggered by a computer (observational condition). We replicated previously reported effects of sensory attenuation and temporal binding. Surprisingly the two implicit measures of SoA were not significantly correlated with each other, nor did they correlate with the explicit measures of SoA. Our results suggest that some explicit and implicit measures of the SoA may tap into different processes.

[1]  M. Brass,et al.  Whodunnit? Electrophysiological Correlates of Agency Judgements , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Attenuation of Self-Generated Tactile Sensations Is Predictive, not Postdictive , 2006, PLoS biology.

[3]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[5]  D. Wegner,et al.  On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  N. Mahajan,et al.  Relation Between Locus of Control of College Teachers and Their Job Satisfaction , 2012 .

[8]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Health-related locus of control and health behaviour among university students in North Rhine Westphalia, Germany , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[9]  P. Haggard,et al.  Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  N. V. van Haren,et al.  Positive priming and intentional binding: Eye-blink rate predicts reward information effects on the sense of agency , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[11]  M. Mimura,et al.  It’s Not My Fault: Postdictive Modulation of Intentional Binding by Monetary Gains and Losses , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Henk Aarts,et al.  On the feeling of doing: dysphoria and the implicit modulation of authorship ascription. , 2006, Behaviour research and therapy.

[13]  M. Buehner,et al.  Temporal binding of action and effect in interval reproduction , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[15]  D. Wegner,et al.  Modulating the sense of agency with external cues , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  On the timescale of stimulus-based action–effect learning , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Intentional Binding Is Driven by the Mere Presence of an Action and Not by Motor Prediction , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  Pereira Deuri.  Magical Ideation and Schizophrenia , 2022 .

[20]  M. Buehner.  Understanding the Past, Predicting the Future , 2012, Psychological science.

[21]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Effect of Distorted Visual Feedback on the Sense of Agency , 2008, Behavioural neurology.

[22]  Per Ola Kristensson,et al.  I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions , 2012, CHI 2012.

[23]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Cardoso-Leite,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences (cid:2) , 2022 .

[25]  T. Carr,et al.  When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[26]  E. Pacherie.  The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  D. Wegner,et al.  Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Attenuation of auditory N1 results from identity‐specific action‐effect prediction , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Elisabeth Pacherie,et al.  The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency , 2007 .

[30]  P. Haggard,et al.  Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Mine is Earlier than Yours: Causal Beliefs Influence the Perceived Time of Action Effects , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[32]  P. Mamassian,et al.  A New Look at Sensory Attenuation , 2010, Psychological science.

[33]  Lars Strother,et al.  Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Sense of agency, associative learning, and schizotypy , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[36]  Simone Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  Vicarious action preparation does not result in sensory attenuation of auditory action effects , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  Carmen Weiss,et al.  The self in action effects: Selective attenuation of self-generated sounds , 2011, Cognition.

[38]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Believing and Perceiving: Authorship Belief Modulates Sensory Attenuation , 2012, PloS one.

[39]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Awareness of action in schizophrenia , 2003, Neuroreport.

[40]  E. Schröger,et al.  Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40‐Hz response to self‐initiated sounds , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation , 1999 .

[42]  Atsushi Sato.  Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others’ actions , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[43]  Christoph Teufel,et al.  Attribution of Intentional Causation Influences the Perception of Observed Movements: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[44]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[45]  Tomohisa Asai,et al.  Schizotypal personality traits and prediction of one’s own movements in motor control: What causes an abnormal sense of agency? , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[46]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[47]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Intentional binding in self-made and observed actions , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  P. Haggard,et al.  Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered , 2008, Cognition.

[49]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[50]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[51]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership , 2005, Cognition.

[52]  M. Buehner,et al.  Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Subliminal action priming modulates the perceived intensity of sensory action consequences , 2014, Cognition.

[56]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[57]  John A. Dewey,et al.  The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person , 2014, Cognition.