Re-Design, Fabrication, and Performance Evaluation of Manual Conical Drum Seeder: A Case Study

Abstract. Rice cultivation is basically carried out by means of transplanting or direct sowing (DS). Although transplanting methods tend to give higher yields, the cost of operation is significantly higher in relation to DS methods. Hence, to date, most famers in the Third World countries use manual broadcasting (MB) due to its economic viability. Manual broadcasting is direct sowing of pre-germinated paddy rice (DSPPR) by hand, based on personnel skill, on wet puddled soils. A major drawback of this method is that the distribution of pre-germinated paddy rice (PPR) is not uniform on the wet puddled soil, which results in a lower yield. Although the mechanization of DS has been achieved via manually operated mechanical drum seeders to overcome this challenge, these have their own inherent drawbacks. The present work was undertaken to re-design and develop a manually operated mechanical drum seeder, which can be used for sowing PPR, by taking into consideration currently available drum seeder designs and their drawbacks. The performance of the new design conical drum seeder (CDS) in the paddy fields was evaluated in relation to MB. The theoretical and effective field capacity, field efficiency, and missing hill percentage were observed to be 0.22 ha/h, 0.18 ha/h, 81% and 3.70%, respectively. The saving of PPR seed was about 75% and increase in yield was about 37% in CDS as compared to MB.

[1]  K. Kathirvel,et al.  An Improved Direct-Rice Seeder , 2003 .

[2]  Asad Sarwar Qureshi,et al.  Sustaining crop water productivity in rice-wheat systems of South Asia: a case study from the Punjab, Pakistan. , 2007 .

[3]  G.S.V. Raghavan,et al.  Investigation on the Influence of Machine and Operational Parameters for the Development of a Manually-Drawn Rice Seeder for Direct Sowing , 2005 .

[4]  Roy Bainer,et al.  Principles of Farm Machinery , 2018 .

[5]  Fusuo Zhang,et al.  From Flooded to Aerobic Conditions in Rice Cultivation: Consequences for Zinc Uptake , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[6]  Sunil K Mathanker,et al.  Ridge Seeding of Pre-germinated Rice in Puddle Fields , 2007 .

[7]  S. Fauve,et al.  Dynamics of Avalanches in a Rotating Cylinder , 1995 .

[8]  S. C. Sharma,et al.  Pantnagar Developed A Mat-type Nursery Raising Device for Rice Transplanters , 2004 .

[9]  D. K. Pandey,et al.  Productivity and economics of transplanted and direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) - based cropping systems in Indo-Gangetic Plains , 2008 .

[10]  J. Ladha,et al.  Saving of Water and Labor in a Rice–Wheat System with No-Tillage and Direct Seeding Technologies , 2007 .

[11]  G. Kirk,et al.  Root-induced solubilization of phosphate in the rhizosphere of lowland rice. , 1995, The New phytologist.

[12]  Muhammad Farooq,et al.  Priming of field-sown rice seed enhances germination, seedling establishment, allometry and yield , 2006, Plant Growth Regulation.

[13]  J. Mathew,et al.  Comparison between transplanting and direct-seeding methods for crop establishment in rice , 2006 .

[14]  J. Ladha,et al.  Productivity Trends in Intensive Rice–Wheat Cropping Systems in Asia , 2015 .

[15]  M. Gill,et al.  Productivity of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) under varying seed rates, weed control and irrigation levels , 2008 .

[16]  Remegio Confesor,et al.  INCREASING WATER PRODUCTIVITY AND WEED SUPPRESSION OF WET SEEDED RICE: EFFECT OF WATER MANAGEMENT AND RICE GENOTYPES , 2000, Experimental Agriculture.

[17]  M. Ivimey Annual report , 1958, IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech.

[18]  G. Botta,et al.  Sowing efficiency of two seeding machines with different metering devices and distribution systems: a comparison using soybean, Glycine max (L) Merr. , 2004 .

[19]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Direct seeding of rice in Asia: emerging issues and strategic research needs for the 21st century. , 2002 .

[20]  Volkhard Buchholtz,et al.  Complex Flow of Granular Material in a Rotating Cylinder , 1995 .

[21]  R. T. Patil,et al.  Self-Propelled Rice Transplanter: A Better Alternative than Manual Transplanting , 2012 .

[22]  M. Farooq,et al.  Enhancing the Performance of Direct Seeded Fine Rice by Seed Priming , 2006 .

[23]  Jonathan E. Lacayanga,et al.  Improved Manual Rice Hill Seeder for Wetland Paddy , 2009 .

[24]  Jagdish K. Ladha,et al.  Weed Management in Direct‐Seeded Rice , 2007 .

[25]  J. Goddard,et al.  Granular Flows , 2020, Built on Sand.

[26]  D. Behera,et al.  Effect of Sedimentation Period on Performance of Rice Transplanter , 2008 .

[27]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Performance evaluation of self propelled rice transplanter. , 2008 .

[28]  Rs Devnani Technology of Pre-germinated Paddy Seeding , 2002 .

[29]  A. Wahid,et al.  Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities , 2011 .

[30]  R. M. Chandima Ratnayake,et al.  Sustainable rice production: a case study on performance evaluation of a seeder , 2011 .

[31]  A. Dobermann,et al.  Rice in the Global Food Supply , 2002 .

[32]  M. Mortimer,et al.  Changing from transplanted rice to direct seeding in the rice-wheat cropping system in India. , 2005 .