SIS in Research and Practice

This chapter provides an overview of how SIS research studies are done; how different SIS systems, services, and users are evaluated; and how all of the above are implemented. First, we present a brief description of common research methods for SIS studies. These methods include observations, interviews, content analysis, and mixed methods. Next, we recognize the challenge of evaluating SIS. We’ll explain some of the popular methods for evaluation in this field, which include usability testing, system-based training-testing, quantitative evaluations, and qualitative evaluations. Finally, various products and services that implement and/or facilitate SIS are introduced. They include different forms of communication tools and methods, peer-driven services, expert-driven services, and social live streaming services (SLSSs ).

[1]  Luanne Freund,et al.  What motivates the online news browser? News item selection in a social information seeking scenario , 2014, Inf. Res..

[2]  Svanhild Aabø,et al.  The information practices of Business PhD students , 2015 .

[3]  Wahiba Bahsoun,et al.  On domain expertise-based roles in collaborative information retrieval , 2014, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[5]  Yann Laurillau,et al.  Clover architecture for groupware , 2002, CSCW '02.

[6]  Barry Smyth,et al.  A Live-User Evaluation of Collaborative Web Search , 2005, IJCAI.

[7]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something , 2008, WWW.

[8]  M. Zimmer “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[9]  G. Marchionini,et al.  Awareness in collaborative information seeking , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Soojung Kim,et al.  Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site , 2009 .

[11]  Chirag Shah,et al.  User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Paul Prekop,et al.  A qualitative study of collaborative information seeking , 2002, J. Documentation.

[14]  Gilad Mishne,et al.  Finding high-quality content in social media , 2008, WSDM '08.

[15]  X. Tian Network domains in social networking sites: expectations, meanings, and social capital , 2016 .

[16]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative Information Seeking: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[17]  Chirag Shah,et al.  User-driven system-mediated collaborative information retrieval , 2014, SIGIR.

[18]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Do your friends make you smarter?: An analysis of social strategies in online information seeking , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Collaborative Web Search , 2009, IJCAI.

[20]  Jae-Shin Lee,et al.  Collaborative Information Seeking in Intercultural Computer-Mediated Communication Groups , 2008, Commun. Res..

[21]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Role-based results redistribution for collaborative information retrieval , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  Ari Rappoport,et al.  What's in a hashtag?: content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities , 2012, WSDM '12.

[23]  Mary Jo Lynch Reference Interviews in Public Libraries , 1978, The Library Quarterly.

[24]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[25]  Vladimir Estivill-Castro,et al.  Usability of real-time unconstrained WWW-co-browsing for educational settings , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[26]  José A. Pino,et al.  A first step to formally evaluate collaborative work , 1997, GROUP.

[27]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Supporting the active learning of collaborative database browsing techniques , 1995 .

[28]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Information search tactics , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[30]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search , 2007, UIST.

[31]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Collaborative Information Retrieval. , 1999 .

[32]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Algorithmic mediation for collaborative exploratory search , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[33]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Modalities, motivations, and materials – investigating traditional and social online Q&A services , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Kaja J. Fietkiewicz,et al.  Information Behavior on Social Live Streaming Services , 2016 .

[35]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites , 2008, CHI.

[36]  J. Oh,et al.  Research agenda for social Q&A , 2009 .

[37]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Informal communication in collaboratories , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[38]  Catherine Sheldrick Ross,et al.  Conducting the Reference Interview: A How-to-do-it Manual for Librarians , 2002, Program.

[39]  W. Pratt,et al.  Collaborative information synthesis I: A model of information behaviors of scientists in medicine and public health , 2006 .

[40]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  Evaluating Collaborative Search Interfaces with Information Seeking Theory , 2009, ArXiv.

[41]  Joanne Smyth,et al.  Virtual Reference Transcript Analysis: A Few Models. , 2003 .

[42]  JoAnn Sears,et al.  Chat Reference Service: An Analysis of one Semester's Data. , 2001, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[43]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Evaluating the synergic effect of collaboration in information seeking , 2011, SIGIR.

[44]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[45]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Braque: Design of an Interface to Support User Interaction in Information Retrieval , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..