Additional Patient Outcomes and Pathways in Evaluations of Testing

Before medical tests are introduced into practice, they should be properly evaluated. Randomized trials and other comprehensive evaluations of tests and test strategies can best be designed based on an understanding of how tests can benefit or harm patients. Tests primarily affect patients’ health by guiding clinical decision making and downstream management, such as the decision to order more tests or to start, stop, or modify treatment. In this article, the authors demonstrate that tests can have additional effects on patient outcome, which may be cognitive, emotional, social, or behavioral. They present a framework to help researchers and policy makers consider the cognitive, emotional, social, and behavioral effects of testing. These additional effects may be important themselves and may also influence the clinical outcomes of testing through different pathways. The authors provide examples from test evaluations in the literature to illustrate how these additional effects can be important in the evaluation of testing or indeed any health intervention.

[1]  R. Lilford,et al.  Tubal flushing for subfertility. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  M. O'Kane,et al.  Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient , 2000, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Croyle,et al.  Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[5]  P. Oefner,et al.  Attitude towards prophylactic surgery and effects of genetic counselling in families with BRCA mutations. Austrian Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Group. , 2000, British journal of cancer.

[6]  J Cuzick,et al.  Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[7]  S. Narod,et al.  What you don't know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D. Wood,et al.  Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group. , 1994, BMJ.

[9]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Informed consent for screening by community sampling. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[10]  F. Goffinet,et al.  Prenatal screening and diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: a review of safety issues and psychological consequences for women who undergo screening , 2007, Prenatal diagnosis.

[11]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  E. Schrimshaw,et al.  Symptom Interpretation and Medication Adherence among Late Middle-age and Older HIV-infected Adults , 1999, Journal of health psychology.

[13]  C. Shaw,et al.  Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[14]  G. Hoff,et al.  Impact of colorectal cancer screening on future lifestyle choices: a three-year randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[15]  B. Biesecker,et al.  Genetic susceptibility testing from a stress and coping perspective. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[16]  E. Schrimshaw,et al.  Symptom interpretation: implications for delay in HIV testing and care among HIV-infected late middle-aged and older adults. , 1999, AIDS care.

[17]  Coral E Gartner,et al.  For Debate , 1903 .

[18]  H. Welch,et al.  The frequency of Pap smear screening in the United States , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  T. Fahey,et al.  How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians? , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[20]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[21]  Keith J Petrie,et al.  The role of illness perceptions in patients with medical conditions , 2007, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[22]  J. Wardle,et al.  Women's experiences of repeated HPV testing in the context of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[23]  M. Heisler,et al.  Discriminatory Attitudes and Practices by Health Workers toward Patients with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[24]  J. Wardle,et al.  Social and psychological impact of HPV testing in cervical screening: a qualitative study , 2006, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[25]  K. Rabe,et al.  Illness Perceptions and COPD: An Emerging Field for COPD Patient Management , 2008, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[26]  H. Büller,et al.  Social aspects of genetic testing for factor V Leiden mutation in healthy individuals and their importance for daily practice. , 2004, Thrombosis research.

[27]  S. Narod,et al.  Breast cancer risk perception among women who have undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Thrombophilia testing in people with venous thromboembolism: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[29]  H. Lynch,et al.  Psychological aspects of monitoring high risk women for breast cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[30]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design to Guide Test Evaluation , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[31]  P. Oefner,et al.  Attitude towards prophylactic surgery and effects of genetic counselling in families with BRCAmutations , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  W. Lawrence,et al.  Short-term impact of cancer prevention and screening activities on quality of life. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  J. Wardle,et al.  Making sense of information about HPV in cervical screening: a qualitative study , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[34]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  D. Nerenz,et al.  Illness Representations and Coping With Health Threats , 2020, Handbook of Psychology and Health (Volume IV).

[36]  P. Walker,et al.  Anxieties in women undergoing colposcopy , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[37]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[38]  F. Collins,et al.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. , 1993, JAMA.

[39]  K. Kukulu,et al.  Psychological effects of amniocentesis on women and their spouses: Importance of the testing period and genetic counseling , 2006, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[40]  K. Rabe,et al.  Illness Perceptions About Asthma Are Determinants of Outcome , 2008, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[41]  Suzanne M. Skevington,et al.  On Subjective Well-being and Quality of Life , 2008, Journal of health psychology.

[42]  Lemuel A Moyé,et al.  Multiple Analyses in Clinical Trials , 2004 .

[43]  M. Conner,et al.  Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[44]  M. Nortvedt,et al.  Mammography screening from the perspective of quality of life: a review of the literature. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[45]  J. Wardle,et al.  The effects of colorectal cancer screening on health attitudes and practices. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[46]  M. Conner,et al.  A mere measurement effect for anticipated regret: impacts on cervical screening attendance. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[47]  D. Wood,et al.  Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study , 1994 .

[48]  J. Dion,et al.  Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Stroke.

[49]  J. Lijmer,et al.  Various randomized designs can be used to evaluate medical tests. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[50]  C. Kozma,et al.  Genetic Discrimination: Perspectives of Consumers , 1996, Science.

[51]  S. Moss,et al.  The psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: 6-month follow-up , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[52]  J. Wardle,et al.  Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[53]  Steven A. Safren,et al.  Perceptions About the Acceptability of Assessments of HIV Medication Adherence in Lilongwe, Malawi and Chennai, India , 2006, AIDS and Behavior.

[54]  C. Viiala,et al.  Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment , 2003, Internal medicine journal.

[55]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients' reassurance: randomised controlled trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.