Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions.

We show that the mechanism for molecular recognition requires one of the interacting proteins, usually the smaller of the two, to anchor a specific side chain in a structurally constrained binding groove of the other protein, providing a steric constraint that helps to stabilize a native-like bound intermediate. We identify the anchor residues in 39 protein-protein complexes and verify that, even in the absence of their interacting partners, the anchor side chains are found in conformations similar to those observed in the bound complex. These ready-made recognition motifs correspond to surface side chains that bury the largest solvent-accessible surface area after forming the complex (> or =100 A2). The existence of such anchors implies that binding pathways can avoid kinetically costly structural rearrangements at the core of the binding interface, allowing for a relatively smooth recognition process. Once anchors are docked, an induced fit process further contributes to forming the final high-affinity complex. This later stage involves flexible (solvent-exposed) side chains that latch to the encounter complex in the periphery of the binding pocket. Our results suggest that the evolutionary conservation of anchor side chains applies to the actual structure that these residues assume before the encounter complex and not just to their loci. Implications for protein docking are also discussed.

[1]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes , 2004, Bioinform..

[2]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Roland L. Dunbrack Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  W. Delano Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  S. Vajda,et al.  Protein docking along smooth association pathways , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S Vajda,et al.  Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein-protein recognition. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  S Vajda,et al.  Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[11]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  S Vajda,et al.  Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[13]  C DeLisi,et al.  Structural principles that govern the peptide-binding motifs of class I MHC molecules. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Werner Braun,et al.  Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  S. Anderson,et al.  Alanine Point-Mutations in the Reactive Region of Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor: Effects on the Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Binding to β-Trypsin and α-Chymotrypsin† , 1996 .

[18]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  D. Ringe What makes a binding site a binding site? , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[21]  D. Madden The three-dimensional structure of peptide-MHC complexes. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[22]  H. Erickson,et al.  Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by Brownian dynamics computer simulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules , 1991, Nature.

[24]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  On the attribution of binding energy in antigen-antibody complexes McPC 603, D1.3, and HyHEL-5. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[25]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.