Assessment of EMG Benchmark Data for Gesture Recognition Using the NinaPro Database

In recent years, many electromyography (EMG) benchmark databases have been made publicly available to the myoelectric control research community. Many small laboratories that lack the instrumentation, access, and experience needed to collect quality EMG data have used these benchmark datasets to explore and propose new signal processing and pattern recognition algorithms. It is widely accepted that noise contamination can affect the performance of myoelectric control systems, and so useful datasets should maintain good signal quality to ensure accurate results for proposed EMG-based gesture recognition systems. Despite the availability and adoption of benchmarks datasets, however, the quality of the EMG signals in these benchmarks has not yet been examined. In this study, the signal quality of the Non-Invasive Adaptive Prosthetics (NinaPro) dataset, the most widely known publicly available benchmark database to date, was comprehensively investigated with the goals of: 1) reporting the level of noise contamination in each NinaPro sub-dataset, 2) proposing signal quality criteria for assessing EMG datasets, 3) analyzing the effect of signal quality on classification performance, and 4) examining the quality of the data labels.

[1]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  EMG feature extraction for tolerance of white Gaussian noise , 2008 .

[2]  Kianoush Nazarpour,et al.  Effect of User Practice on Prosthetic Finger Control With an Intuitive Myoelectric Decoder , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Automated Biosignal Quality Analysis for Electromyography Using a One-Class Support Vector Machine , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  Mikhail Kuznetsov,et al.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Repeatability of grasp recognition for robotic hand prosthesis control based on sEMG data , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[7]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses , 2014, Scientific Data.

[8]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Identification of Contaminant Type in Surface Electromyography (EMG) Signals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Angkoon Phinyomark,et al.  Feature Extraction and Selection for Myoelectric Control Based on Wearable EMG Sensors , 2018, Sensors.

[10]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  G Staude,et al.  Objective motor response onset detection in surface myoelectric signals. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks , 2017, PloS one.

[13]  A E Grassino,et al.  Automatic assessment of electromyogram quality. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.