From simple to detailed models for cell polarization

Many mathematical models have been proposed for the process of cell polarization. Some of these are ‘functional models’ that capture a class of dynamical behaviour, whereas others are derived from features of signalling molecules. Some mechanistic models are detailed, and therefore complex, whereas others are simplified. Each type contributes to our understanding of cell polarization. However, the huge variety at different levels of detail makes comparisons challenging. Here, we provide examples of both elementary and more detailed models for polarization. We also display how a recent mathematical method, local perturbation analysis, can provide an appropriate tool for such comparisons. This technique simplifies and speeds up the model development process by revealing the effect of model extensions, parameter variations and in silico manipulations such as knock-out or over-expression of key molecules. Finally, simulations in both one dimension and two dimensions, and particularly in deforming two-dimensional ‘cells’, can highlight behaviour not captured by traditional simulation methods.

[1]  A. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis. 1953. , 1990, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[2]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Modelling Cell Polarization Driven by Synthetic Spatially Graded Rac Activation , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  G. Gerisch Self-organizing actin waves that simulate phagocytic cup structures , 2010, PMC biophysics.

[4]  Georg R. Walther,et al.  Deterministic Versus Stochastic Cell Polarisation Through Wave-Pinning , 2012, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[5]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  The Cellular Potts Model and Biophysical Properties of Cells, Tissues and Morphogenesis , 2007 .

[6]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  A. Hyman,et al.  Polarization of PAR Proteins by Advective Triggering of a Pattern-Forming System , 2011, Science.

[8]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  How Cells Integrate Complex Stimuli: The Effect of Feedback from Phosphoinositides and Cell Shape on Cell Polarization and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[10]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Mobile actin clusters and traveling waves in cells recovering from actin depolymerization. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Synthetic spatially graded Rac activation drives cell polarization and movement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Mark Zajac,et al.  The moving boundary node method: A level set-based, finite volume algorithm with applications to cell motility , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Membrane Tension Maintains Cell Polarity by Confining Signals to the Leading Edge during Neutrophil Migration , 2012, Cell.

[14]  J. Sethian,et al.  LEVEL SET METHODS FOR FLUID INTERFACES , 2003 .

[15]  Marc W Kirschner,et al.  An Actin-Based Wave Generator Organizes Cell Motility , 2007, PLoS biology.

[16]  V. Grieneisen,et al.  Dynamics of auxin patterning in plant morphogenesis - A multilevel model study , 2009 .

[17]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Phosphoinositides and Rho proteins spatially regulate actin polymerization to initiate and maintain directed movement in a one-dimensional model of a motile cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[18]  A. Hyman,et al.  PAR proteins diffuse freely across the anterior–posterior boundary in polarized C. elegans embryos , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Asymptotic and Bifurcation Analysis of Wave-Pinning in a Reaction-Diffusion Model for Cell Polarization , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[20]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion , 2009, Nature.

[21]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Mathematical Model for Spatial Segregation of the Rho-Family GTPases Based on Inhibitory Crosstalk , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[22]  Jelena Stajic,et al.  Redundant mechanisms for stable cell locomotion revealed by minimal models. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Andrew B Goryachev,et al.  Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a Turing‐type mechanism of yeast cell polarity , 2008, FEBS letters.

[24]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  A. Turing The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[27]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Shuji Ishihara,et al.  A Mass Conserved Reaction–Diffusion System Captures Properties of Cell Polarity , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  L Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Regimes of wave type patterning driven by refractory actin feedback: transition from static polarization to dynamic wave behaviour , 2012, Physical biology.

[31]  Annie Z. Tremp Malaria: Plasmodium develops in lymph nodes , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[32]  S. Osher,et al.  Geometric Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics , 2011, Springer New York.