Enhancing obstetric and gynecology ultrasound images by adaptation of the speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion filter

OBJECTIVE So far there is no ideal speckle reduction filtering technique that is capable of enhancing and reducing the level of noise in medical ultrasound (US) images, while efficiently responding to medical experts' validation criteria which quite often include a subjective component. This paper presents an interactive tool called evolutionary speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion filter (EVOSRAD) that performs adaptive speckle filtering on ultrasound B-mode still images. The medical expert runs the algorithm interactively, having a permanent control over the output, and guiding the filtering process towards obtaining enhanced images that agree to his/her subjective quality criteria. METHODS AND MATERIAL We employ an interactive evolutionary algorithm (IGA) to adapt on-line the parameters of a speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion (SRAD) filter. For a given input US image, the algorithm evolves the parameters of the SRAD filter according to subjective criteria of the medical expert who runs the interactive algorithm. The method and its validation are applied to a test bed comprising both real and simulated obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) ultrasound images. RESULTS The potential of the method is analyzed in comparison to other speckle reduction filters: the original SRAD filter, the anisotropic diffusion, offset and median filters. Results obtained show the good potential of the method on several classes of OB/GYN ultrasound images, as well as on a synthetic image simulating a real fetal US image. Quality criteria for the evaluation and validation of the method include subjective scoring given by the medical expert who runs the interactive method, as well as objective global and local quality criteria. CONCLUSIONS The method presented allows the medical expert to design its own filters according to the degree of medical expertise as well as to particular and often subjective assessment criteria. A filter is designed for a given class of ultrasound images and for a given medical expert who will later use the respective filter in clinical practice. The process of designing a filter is simple and employs an interactive visualization and scoring stage that does not require image processing knowledge. Results show that filters tailored using the presented method achieve better quality scores than other more generic speckle filtering techniques.

[1]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Multiscale Nonlinear Diffusion and Shock Filter for Ultrasound Image Enhancement , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[3]  J. Saniie,et al.  Analysis of homomorphic processing for ultrasonic grain signal characterization , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Thomas L. Szabo,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out , 2004 .

[6]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  Johan Montagnat,et al.  Anisotropic filtering for model-based segmentation of 4D cylindrical echocardiographic images , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  L. Lowe,et al.  Sonography of the neonatal spine: part 1, Normal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and variations that may simulate disorders. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  C.P. Loizou,et al.  Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Zvi Friedman,et al.  The combined effect of spatial compounding and nonlinear filtering on the speckle reduction in ultrasound images. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[11]  Azeddine Beghdadi,et al.  Image analysis using anisotropic local contrast , 2004, Proceedings of 2004 International Symposium on Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing, 2004..

[12]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  A Comparison of Selection Schemes Used in Evolutionary Algorithms , 1996, Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  A. Venetsanopoulos,et al.  Order statistics in digital image processing , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers , 2004 .

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[16]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  2-D and 3-D Image Registration: for Medical, Remote Sensing, and Industrial Applications , 2005 .

[17]  William K. Pratt,et al.  Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside , 2001 .

[18]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice - evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[20]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[22]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  M. Bethune Literature review and suggested protocol for managing ultrasound soft markers for Down syndrome: thickened nuchal fold, echogenic bowel, shortened femur, shortened humerus, pyelectasis and absent or hypoplastic nasal bone. , 2007, Australasian radiology.

[24]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Nonlinear adaptive filters for speckle suppression in ultrasonic images , 1996, Signal Process..

[26]  L. Lowe,et al.  Sonography of the neonatal spine: part 2, Spinal disorders. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Adaptive Nonlocal Filtering: A Fast Alternative to Anisotropic Diffusion for Image Enhancement , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..