Effect of geometric parameters on the drag of the cavity flameholder based on the variance analysis method

Abstract Wall cavities have been widely used as flameholders in scramjet engines to prolong the residence time of the fuel and the air in supersonic flow. These devices improve the combustion efficiency of the scramjet combustor, and also impose additional drag on the engine. In this paper, the two-dimensional coupled implicit NS equations, the standard k – e turbulence model and the finite-rate/eddy-dissipation reaction model have been applied to simulate numerically the combustion flow field of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor with a cavity flameholder. The effects of the geometric parameters, i.e. the upstream depth, the ratio of the length to the upstream depth, the ratio of the downstream to the upstream depth and the swept angle, on the drag force of the cavity flameholder for a heated flow are investigated using the variance analysis method. The obtained results show that the variance analysis method can be used to accurately analyze the effects of the geometric parameters on the performance of the cavity flameholder. The effects of the ratios of the length to the upstream depth and of the downstream to the upstream depth on the drag force of the cavity flameholder are substantial, and they must be foremost when considering the design of the cavity flameholder. At the same time, when the downstream depth is equal to the upstream depth, the drag force of the cavity flameholder is the largest, and on increasing the ratio of the length to the upstream depth, the drag force on the cavity flameholder varies from negative to positive. A cavity flameholder with a large ratio of the length to the upstream depth brings large drag force in the combustion flow field.

[1]  Lin Ma,et al.  Investigation on the flameholding mechanisms in supersonic flows: backward-facing step and cavity flameholder , 2010, J. Vis..

[2]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Compressible cavity flow oscillation due to shear layer instabilities and pressure feedback , 1995 .

[3]  Wei Huang,et al.  Numerical study of attack angle characteristics for integrated hypersonic vehicle , 2009 .

[4]  L. T. Nguyen,et al.  NASA hypersonic flight demonstrators—overview, status, and future plans , 2004 .

[5]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[6]  S. Baek,et al.  Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection , 2004 .

[7]  V. Katta,et al.  Flame Stabilization in Small Cavities , 2010 .

[8]  Lihong Chen,et al.  Experimental investigation on the cavity-based scramjet model , 2009 .

[9]  Wang Zhen-guo Configuration Effect Analysis of Scramjet Combustor Based on the Integral Balanceable Method , 2009 .

[10]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  Exergy analysis of hypersonic propulsion systems: Performance comparison of two different scramjet configurations at cruise conditions , 2008 .

[11]  Randall T. Voland,et al.  X-43A Hypersonic vehicle technology development , 2006 .

[12]  Tarun Mathur,et al.  Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors , 2001 .

[13]  Wei Huang,et al.  Effect of cavity flame holder configuration on combustion flow field performance of integrated hypersonic vehicle , 2010 .

[14]  Y L Xiao,et al.  Investigations on ethylene combustion in a scramjet combustor using resistance heaters , 2008 .

[15]  Wang Zhenguo Parametric sensitivity analysis of scramjet nozzle configuration , 2009 .

[16]  Wei Huang,et al.  Research status of key techniques for shock-induced combustion ramjet (shcramjet) engine , 2010 .

[17]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Stability limits of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flow , 2005 .

[18]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[19]  Daren Yu,et al.  Parametric performance analysis of multiple Re-Cooled Cycle for hydrogen fueled scramjet , 2009 .

[20]  T. N. Veziroglu,et al.  Computer modeling and comparison of hydrogen-fueled and methane-fueled hypersonic vehicles , 1992 .

[21]  G. B. Northam,et al.  Effects of hydrogen active cooling on scramjet engine performance , 1996 .

[22]  M. Norusis SPSS statistics 17.0 : guide to data analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Ahmed Z. Al-Garni,et al.  Comparison of H2, CH4 and H2O for cooling an aerospace plane , 1996 .

[24]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview , 2001 .