Three-dimensional sonoelastography: principles and practices.

Sonoelastography is an ultrasound imaging technique where low amplitude, low-frequency shear waves (less than 0.1 mm displacement and less than 1 kHz frequency) are propagated through internal organs, while real-time Doppler techniques are used to image the resulting vibration pattern. When a discrete hard inhomogeneity, such as a tumour, is present within a region of soft tissue, a decrease in the vibration amplitude will occur at its location. This forms the basis for tumour detection using sonoelastography. For three-dimensional (3D) imaging the acquisition of sequential tomographic slices using this technique, combined with image segmentation, enables the reconstruction, quantification and visualization of tumour volumes. Sonoelastography and magnetic resonance images (MRI) of a tissue phantom containing a hard isoechoic inclusion are compared to evaluate the accuracy of this method. The tumour delineation from sonoelastography was found to have good agreement with the tumour from MRI except for a bleeding at one of its ends. Although sonoelastography is still in an experimental phase, the principles behind this imaging modality are explained and some practical aspects of acquiring sonoelastography images are described. Results from a 3D sonoelastography reconstruction of a tissue mimicking phantom and an ex vivo whole prostate specimen are presented.

[1]  C. Kasai,et al.  Real-Time Two-Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[2]  C. Kasai,et al.  Real-Time Two-Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique , 1985, IEEE 1985 Ultrasonics Symposium.

[3]  F. S. Vinson,et al.  A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  K. Parker,et al.  Sono-Elasticity: Medical Elasticity Images Derived from Ultrasound Signals in Mechanically Vibrated Targets , 1988 .

[5]  R. Dashen,et al.  Calculations of acoustic scattering from the ocean surface , 1990 .

[6]  Y. Yamakoshi,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of internal vibration of soft tissue under forced vibration , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  K. Parker,et al.  On estimating the amplitude of harmonic vibration from the Doppler spectrum of reflected signals , 1990 .

[8]  K. Parker,et al.  "Sonoelasticity" images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[10]  K. Parker,et al.  Sonoelasticity of organs: shear waves ring a bell , 1992, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  J H Ellis,et al.  MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  K. Parker,et al.  Sonoelasticity imaging: theory and experimental verification. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J M Rubin,et al.  Fractional moving blood volume: estimation with power Doppler US. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  M. Brawer,et al.  Role of transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsy , 1996, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[16]  Fractional Moving Blood Volume: Estimation with Power Doppler US , 1996 .

[17]  K J Parker,et al.  Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue--a review. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  K J Parker,et al.  Vibration sonoelastography and the detectability of lesions. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  L. Egevad,et al.  Estimation of prostate cancer volume by multiple core biopsies before radical prostatectomy. , 1998, Urology.

[20]  W. Catalona,et al.  Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng./ml. or less. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[21]  C. Öbek,et al.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[22]  M Fink,et al.  A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: the acoustic impulse technique. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.