A Comparative Analysis of Online Discussion Participation Protocols

Abstract Thirty-seven graduate students in two course sections were required to contribute to the online discussion of an instructional design case study. The discussion forums required different participation protocols; students in section one implemented a constructive argumentation approach while students in section two had less structure for their postings. The results revealed that both sections exhibited co-construction of knowledge as measured using the content analysis protocol the Interaction Analysis Model (IAM), but the less structured section reached the highest phase of knowledge building. In addition we found that the constructive argumentation approach and the task-oriented nature of the discussion influenced the interactions and co-construction of knowledge. The findings reveal practical implications for effective design of online discussion that may improve the quality of learning.

[1]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving , 2001 .

[2]  C. Fulford,et al.  Perceptions of Interaction: The critical predictor in distance education , 1993 .

[3]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[4]  T. Anderson,et al.  Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction , 1998 .

[5]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[7]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[8]  E. Allen,et al.  Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United State , 2004 .

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences , 2002, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[10]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .

[11]  D. J. Pullinger,et al.  Chit-chat to electronic journals: Computer conferencing supports scientific communication , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[13]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  AI in Reverse: Computer Tools That Turn Cognitive , 1988 .

[14]  Tarald O. Kvålseth,et al.  Note on Cohen's Kappa , 1989 .

[15]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Fostering Students' Statistical and Scientific Thinking: Lessons Learned From an Innovative College Course , 2000 .

[16]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[17]  Jason Ravitz.  An ISD Model for Building Online Communities: Furthering the Dialogue. , 1997 .

[18]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Conflict Between Teaching and Scientific Sense-Making: The Case of a Curriculum on Seasonal Change , 1993, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[19]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[21]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  The ID CaseBook : case studies in instructional design / by Peggy A. Ertmer and James Quinn , 1998 .

[22]  Chris Colbourn,et al.  Mindweave: communication, computers and distance education , 1990 .

[23]  R. Pea,et al.  Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications , 2004 .

[24]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Analysis of group problem-solving tasks in a geometry course for teachers using computer-mediated conferencing , 2000 .

[25]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[26]  Alec M. Bodzin,et al.  Dialogue Patterns of Preservice Science Teachers Using Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[27]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. , 2001 .

[28]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[29]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[30]  Douglas R. Ward,et al.  Adding Educational Value to the Web: Active Learning with AlivePages. , 1997 .

[31]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. , 1999 .

[32]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Software-Realized Scaffolding to Facilitate Programming for Science Learning , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[33]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  No . 2-98 Content Analysis of Online Discussion in an Applied Educational Psychology , 2000 .

[34]  Stephen Collins,et al.  The Internet as a Tool. , 1996 .

[35]  Robert M. Fano.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1985, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[36]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[37]  Joan Mazur,et al.  CONVERSATION ANALYSIS FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGISTS: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES FOR RESEARCHING THE STRUCTURES, PROCESSES, AND MEANING OF ON-LINE TALK , 2003 .

[38]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Argumentation, Computer Support, and the Educational Context of Confronting Cognitions , 2003 .

[39]  Lorraine Sherry,et al.  Issues in Distance Learning , 1995 .

[40]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[41]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[42]  Gavriel Salomon.  AI in Reverse: Computer Tools That Become Cognitive. , 1988 .

[43]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols , 2004 .

[44]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications , 1994 .

[45]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[46]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[47]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .