Simulating Market Dynamics: Interactions between Consumer Psychology and Social Networks

Markets can show different types of dynamics, from quiet markets dominated by one or a few products, to markets with continual penetration of new and reintroduced products. In a previous article we explored the dynamics of markets from a psychological perspective using a multi-agent simulation model. The main results indicated that the behavioral rules dominating the artificial consumer's decision making determine the resulting market dynamics, such as fashions, lock-in, and unstable renewal. Results also show the importance of psychological variables like social networks, preferences, and the need for identity to explain the dynamics of markets. In this article we extend this work in two directions. First, we will focus on a more systematic investigation of the effects of different network structures. The previous article was based on Watts and Strogatz's approach, which describes the small-world and clustering characteristics in networks. More recent research demonstrated that many large networks display a scale-free power-law distribution for node connectivity. In terms of market dynamics this may imply that a small proportion of consumers may have an exceptional influence on the consumptive behavior of others (hubs, or early adapters). We show that market dynamics is a self-organized property depending on the interaction between the agents' decision-making process (heuristics), the product characteristics (degree of satisfaction of unit of consumption, visibility), and the structure of interactions between agents (size of network and hubs in a social network).

[1]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[2]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[3]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[4]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Wander Jager,et al.  Faculteit Der Economische Wetenschappen En Econometric Serie Research Memoranda Fashions, Habits and Changing Preferences: Simulations of Psychological Factors Affecting Market Dynamics Fashions, Habits and Changing Preferences: Simulation of Psychological Factors Affecting Market Dynamics , 2022 .

[6]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Real-life economics : understanding wealth creation , 1992 .

[7]  Emanuel Rosen,et al.  The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word of Mouth Marketing , 2000 .

[8]  A. Grabowski,et al.  Epidemic spreading in a hierarchical social network. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Roland Soong,et al.  Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand , 1986 .

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[12]  W. Jager Modelling consumer behaviour , 2000 .

[13]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[14]  Werner F. M. De Bondt,et al.  Herding in analyst earnings forecasts: evidence from the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[15]  P. Baran The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1957 .

[16]  G. Rose,et al.  Social Values, Conformity, and Dress , 1994 .

[17]  M. Newman,et al.  Small Worlds: The Structure of Social Networks , 1999 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Brand Congruence in Interpersonal Relations: A Social Network Analysis , 1984 .