Determinants of Dwell Time in Visual Search: Similarity or Perceptual Difficulty?

The present study examined the factors that determine the dwell times in a visual search task, that is, the duration the gaze remains fixated on an object. It has been suggested that an item’s similarity to the search target should be an important determiner of dwell times, because dwell times are taken to reflect the time needed to reject the item as a distractor, and such discriminations are supposed to be harder the more similar an item is to the search target. In line with this similarity view, a previous study shows that, in search for a target ring of thin line-width, dwell times on thin linewidth Landolt C’s distractors were longer than dwell times on Landolt C’s with thick or medium linewidth. However, dwell times may have been longer on thin Landolt C’s because the thin line-width made it harder to detect whether the stimuli had a gap or not. Thus, it is an open question whether dwell times on thin line-width distractors were longer because they were similar to the target or because the perceptual decision was more difficult. The present study de-coupled similarity from perceptual difficulty, by measuring dwell times on thin, medium and thick line-width distractors when the target had thin, medium or thick line-width. The results showed that dwell times were longer on target-similar than target-dissimilar stimuli across all target conditions and regardless of the line-width. It is concluded that prior findings of longer dwell times on thin linewidth-distractors can clearly be attributed to target similarity. As will be discussed towards the end, the finding of similarity effects on dwell times has important implications for current theories of visual search and eye movement control.

[1]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Running head : SACCADIC SELECTIVITY DURING VISUAL SEARCH Saccadic selectivity during visual search : The influence of central processing difficulty , 2002 .

[2]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[3]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[4]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  The mind's eye : cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2003 .

[5]  K Rayner,et al.  Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Ilpo Kojo,et al.  Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Top-down attention selection is fine grained. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[9]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[10]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997 .

[11]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  A Dissociation Between Attention and Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[15]  Jaj Jacques Roufs,et al.  Text quality metrics for visual display units:: I. Methodological aspects , 1997 .

[16]  A. Jacobs Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control? , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[18]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Searching for an O in an array of Cs: Eye movements track moment-to-moment processing in visual search , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Keith Rayner Eye Movements in Reading , 2001 .

[20]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  G. Zelinsky Using Eye Saccades to Assess the Selectivity of Search Movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[23]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.