High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort

The effects of contextual interference on practice behavior, transfer performance, and cognitive load for learning troubleshooting skills were studied. A low contextual interference (LCI) condition, in which subjects practiced to diagnose system failures in a blocked schedule, was compared with a high contextual interference (HCI) condition, in which failures were practiced in a random schedule. The following hypotheses are stated. Hypothesis 1: during practice, subjects in the HCI group will require more time to reach a high performance level (i.e., more accurate and/or faster diagnoses of system failures) on practice problems and will have to invest more mental effort relative to subjects in the LCI group. Hypothesis 2: subjects in the HCI group will show higher performance and lower invested mental effort on far transfer test problems, relative to subjects in the LCI group, but there will be no difference between the groups on near transfer test problems. The results showed that subjects in the HCI group were more accurate in diagnosing far transfer problems, although during practice they needed more time to diagnose system failures and made significantly more incorrect diagnoses.

[1]  Otto Jelsma,et al.  Training for reflective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills , 1992 .

[2]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference: Contributions of practice , 1990 .

[3]  R. Magill,et al.  Can Forgetting Facilitate Skill Acquisition , 1985 .

[4]  John B. Shea,et al.  Context Effects in Memory and Learning Movement Information , 1983 .

[5]  O. Bratfisch.  Perceived Item-Difficulty in Three Tests of Intellectual Performance Capacity. , 1972 .

[6]  Otto Jelsma,et al.  Process: program for research on operator control in an experimental simulated setting , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[8]  D. Gopher,et al.  On the Psychophysics of Workload: Why Bother with Subjective Measures? , 1984 .

[9]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The Transfer Paradox: Effects of Contextual Interference on Retention and Transfer Performance of a Complex Cognitive Skill , 1997 .

[10]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[11]  Julius Marie Pieters,et al.  Practice schedule and cognitive style interaction in learning a maze task , 1989 .

[12]  C. Bray.  Transfer of learning. , 1928 .

[13]  Fred Paas,et al.  Automation and schema acquisition in learning elementary computer programming : implications for the design of practice , 1990 .

[14]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[15]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[16]  R. Magill,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. The Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor-Skill Acquisition i , 2022 .

[17]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .