In VANETs we trust?: characterizing RF jamming in vehicular networks

In this paper we study the impact of RF jamming on 802.11p car-to-car communications. We build a jammer on a software defined radio and implement constant, reactive and pilot jamming patterns, whose effectiveness is first measured in an anechoic chamber. We perform extensive experiments in two relevant outdoor scenarios, namely a straight road in an open space as well as a dense building scenario with a crossroad and characterize the performance of 802.11p communications under the impact of constant and reactive RF jamming. The constant jammer is able to dramatically disrupt communication regardless of the scenario. The reactive jammer exhibits a low impact in scenarios with reduced line-of-sight as its jamming success greatly depends on the relative position of the nodes. It is, however, very effective in open-space scenarios. In general, we observe that RF jamming can cause large communication-blind areas. Under these conditions, critical safety applications would simply fail in their purpose of timely warning dissemination.

[1]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  The feasibility of launching and detecting jamming attacks in wireless networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[2]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  Optimal data rate selection for vehicle safety communications , 2008, VANET '08.

[3]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[4]  Renato Lo Cigno,et al.  Emergency braking: a study of network and application performance , 2011, VANET '11.

[5]  Mário Serafim Nunes,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11e , 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[6]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Understanding and mitigating the impact of RF interference on 802.11 networks , 2007, SIGCOMM 2007.

[7]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  5.9 GHz inter-vehicle communication at intersections: a validated non-line-of-sight path-loss and fading model , 2011, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[8]  E. Schoch,et al.  Vulnerabilities of Geocast Message Distribution , 2007, 2007 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[9]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[10]  J. Martinez,et al.  Power measurements of OFDM signals , 2004, 2004 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37559).

[11]  Srikanth V. Krishnamurthy,et al.  A Measurement-Driven Anti-Jamming System for 802.11 Networks , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Alexander Paier,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11p physical layer infrastructure-to-vehicle real-world measurements , 2010, 2010 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL 2010).

[13]  Srikanth V. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Denial of Service Attacks in Wireless Networks: The Case of Jammers , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Mate Boban,et al.  Impact of Vehicles as Obstacles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Ilenia Tinnirello,et al.  On the side-effects of proprietary solutions for fading and interference mitigation in IEEE 802.11b/g outdoor links , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Jalel Ben-Othman,et al.  Detection of Radio Interference Attacks in VANET , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[17]  T. Charles Clancy,et al.  Efficient OFDM Denial: Pilot Jamming and Pilot Nulling , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[18]  Ivan Martinovic,et al.  WiSec 2011 demo: RFReact---a real-time capable and channel-aware jamming platform , 2011, MOCO.

[19]  Yang Zhang,et al.  V-PADA: Vehicle-Platoon-Aware Data Access in VANETs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[20]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  Jamming sensor networks: attack and defense strategies , 2006, IEEE Network.

[21]  A. Festag,et al.  CAR-2-X Communication SDK - A Software Toolkit for Rapid Application Development and Experimentations , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[22]  T. Karhima,et al.  IEEE 802.11b/g WLAN tolerance to jamming , 2004, IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004..

[23]  Amer Aijaz,et al.  Attacks on Inter Vehicle Communication Systems-an Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  Stefan Savage,et al.  802.11 Denial-of-Service Attacks: Real Vulnerabilities and Practical Solutions , 2003, USENIX Security Symposium.

[25]  Ilkka Harjula,et al.  Performance of IEEE 802.11 based WLAN devices under various jamming signals , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[26]  Srdjan Capkun,et al.  Detection of Reactive Jamming in Sensor Networks , 2009 .