Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology: Process Applications, Design, and Performance

The moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) can operate as a 2- (anoxic) or 3-(aerobic) phase system with buoyant free-moving plastic biofilm carriers. These systems can be used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment, aquaculture, potable water denitrification, and, in roughing, secondary, tertiary, and sidestream applications. The system includes a submerged biofilm reactor and liquid-solids separation unit. The MBBR process benefits include the following: (1) capacity to meet treatment objectives similar to activated sludge systems with respect to carbon-oxidation and nitrogen removal, but requires a smaller tank volume than a clarifier-coupled activated sludge system; (2) biomass retention is clarifier-independent and solids loading to the liquid-solids separation unit is reduced significantly when compared with activated sludge systems; (3) the MBBR is a continuous-flow process that does not require a special operational cycle for biofilm thickness, L(F), control (e.g., biologically active filter backwashing); and (4) liquid-solids separation can be achieved with a variety of processes, including conventional and compact high-rate processes. Information related to system design is fragmented and poorly documented. This paper seeks to address this issue by summarizing state-of-the art MBBR design procedures and providing the reader with an overview of some commercially available systems and their components.

[1]  C. Bott,et al.  Evaluation of alternative electron donors for denitrifying moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs). , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Nitrogen removal from dilute wastewater in cold climate using moving‐bed biofilm reactors , 1995 .

[3]  E Plaza,et al.  A one-stage system with partial nitritation and anammox processes in the moving-bed biofilm reactor. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Wei Lin,et al.  Effect of Temperature on Biofilm Growth Dynamics and Nitrification Kinetics in a Full-Scale MBBR System , 2009 .

[5]  G T Daigger,et al.  Uncertainty in bulk-liquid hydrodynamics and biofilm dynamics creates uncertainties in biofilm reactor design. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Bjørnar Eikebrokk,et al.  Design and operations of the Kaldnes moving bed biofilm reactors , 2006 .

[7]  U. Nyberg,et al.  Experiences from MBBR Post-Denitrification Process in Long-term Operation at two WWTPs , 2010 .

[8]  P L McCarty,et al.  A model of substrate utilization by bacterial films. , 1976, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[9]  A. Mulder,et al.  DEAMOX--new biological nitrogen removal process based on anaerobic ammonia oxidation coupled to sulphide-driven conversion of nitrate into nitrite. , 2006, Water research.

[10]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. , 2006 .

[11]  T. Leiknes,et al.  Tracking particle size distributions in a moving bed biofilm membrane reactor for treatment of municipal wastewater. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  H. Ødegaard,et al.  Design and Operation of Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Plants for Very Low Effluent Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations , 2007 .

[13]  B. Rusten,et al.  Pilot testing and preliminary design of moving bed biofilm reactors for nitrogen removal at the FREVAR wastewater treatment plant , 2000 .

[14]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Nitrification in a moving bed biofilm reactor , 1994 .

[15]  H. Ødegaard,et al.  The influence of carrier size and shape in the moving bed biofilm process , 2000 .

[16]  J. Jansen,et al.  Post denitrification in a moving bed biofilm reactor process , 1998 .

[17]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Design and Operation of Nutrient Removal Plants for Very Low Effluent Concentrations , 2007 .

[18]  M. Ragazzi,et al.  Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater , 2000 .

[19]  H. Ng,et al.  Effects of solid retention time on the performance of submerged anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Roberto Canziani,et al.  Effects of temperature on tertiary nitrification in moving-bed biofilm reactors. , 2006, Water research.

[21]  H. Ødegaard,et al.  Separation of Biomass From Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBRs) , 2010 .

[22]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Nitrification of municipal wastewater in moving-bed biofilm reactors , 1995 .

[23]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Startup of reactors for anoxic ammonium oxidation: experiences from the first full-scale anammox reactor in Rotterdam. , 2007, Water research.

[24]  H. Ødegaard,et al.  STATE OF THE ART IN EUROPE OF THE MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) PROCESS , 2004 .