Neuronal avalanche dynamics indicates different universality classes in neuronal cultures

Neuronal avalanches have become an ubiquitous tool to describe the activity of large neuronal assemblies. The emergence of scale-free statistics with well-defined exponents has led to the belief that the brain might operate near a critical point. Yet not much is known in terms of how the different exponents arise or how robust they are. Using calcium imaging recordings of dissociated neuronal cultures we show that the exponents are not universal, and that significantly different exponents arise with different culture preparations, leading to the existence of different universality classes. Naturally developing cultures show avalanche statistics consistent with those of a mean-field branching process, however, cultures grown in the presence of folic acid metabolites appear to be in a distinct universality class with significantly different critical exponents. Given the increased synaptic density and number of feedback loops in folate reared cultures, our results suggest that network topology plays a leading role in shaping the avalanche dynamics. We also show that for both types of cultures pronounced correlations exist in the sizes of neuronal avalanches indicating size clustering, being much stronger in folate reared cultures.

[1]  Jörn Davidsen,et al.  No evidence of magnitude clustering in an aftershock sequence of nano- and picoseismicity. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[2]  L. de Arcangelis,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and neuronal refractory time cause scaling behaviour of neuronal avalanches , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Universal critical dynamics in high resolution neuronal avalanche data. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[4]  D. Plenz,et al.  Spontaneous cortical activity in awake monkeys composed of neuronal avalanches , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  David W. Eaton,et al.  Nontrivial clustering of microseismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing , 2016 .

[6]  J. Sethna,et al.  Crackling noise : Complex systems , 2001 .

[7]  G. Teskey,et al.  High dose folic acid supplementation of rats alters synaptic transmission and seizure susceptibility in offspring , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Jörn Davidsen,et al.  Are earthquake magnitudes clustered? , 2011, Physical review letters.

[9]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Jordi Soriano,et al.  Dominance of Metric Correlations in Two-Dimensional Neuronal Cultures Described through a Random Field Ising Model. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[11]  F. Lombardi,et al.  Temporal correlations in neuronal avalanche occurrence , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  A. Deluca,et al.  Fitting and goodness-of-fit test of non-truncated and truncated power-law distributions , 2012, Acta Geophysica.

[13]  Pablo Balenzuela,et al.  Criticality in Large-Scale Brain fMRI Dynamics Unveiled by a Novel Point Process Analysis , 2012, Front. Physio..

[14]  Nicholas Bennett,et al.  Criticality Maximizes Complexity in Neural Tissue , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[15]  P. Alstrøm,et al.  COMPLEXITY AND CRITICALITY , 2004 .

[16]  G. Pruessner Self-Organised Criticality: Theory, Models and Characterisation , 2012 .

[17]  Angelo Gemignani,et al.  Fractal Complexity in Spontaneous EEG Metastable-State Transitions: New Vistas on Integrated Neural Dynamics , 2010, Front. Physiology.

[18]  L. L. Bologna,et al.  Self-organization and neuronal avalanches in networks of dissociated cortical neurons , 2008, Neuroscience.

[19]  Lea Fleischer,et al.  In All Likelihood Statistical Modelling And Inference Using Likelihood , 2016 .

[20]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality in Developing Neuronal Networks , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Andreas Klaus,et al.  Statistical Analyses Support Power Law Distributions Found in Neuronal Avalanches , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , 2007 .

[23]  Yves Laberge Self-organised criticality: theory, models and characterisation , 2014 .

[24]  Nicholas Bennett,et al.  Analysis of Power Laws, Shape Collapses, and Neural Complexity: New Techniques and MATLAB Support via the NCC Toolbox , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[25]  Jochen Triesch,et al.  Spike avalanches in vivo suggest a driven, slightly subcritical brain state , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[26]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Fast online deconvolution of calcium imaging data , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Stanley,et al.  Self-organized branching processes: Mean-field theory for avalanches. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[28]  J. Baró,et al.  Analysis of power-law exponents by maximum-likelihood maps. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  M. Copelli,et al.  Undersampled Critical Branching Processes on Small-World and Random Networks Fail to Reproduce the Statistics of Spike Avalanches , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  Jaume Casademunt,et al.  Noise focusing and the emergence of coherent activity in neuronal cultures , 2013, Nature Physics.

[31]  J. Sethna,et al.  Crackling noise , 2001, Nature.

[32]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[33]  Viola Priesemann,et al.  Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche distributions recorded in vivo , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[34]  John M. Beggs Neuronal avalanche , 2007, Scholarpedia.