A Miniature Aerosol Sensor for Detecting Polydisperse Airborne Ultrafine Particles

Counting and sizing of polydisperse airborne nanoparticles have attracted most attentions owing to increasing widespread presence of airborne engineered nanoparticles or ultrafine particles. Here we report a miniature aerosol sensor to detect particle size distribution of polydisperse ultrafine particles based on ion diffusion charging and electrical detection. The aerosol sensor comprises a couple of planar electrodes printed on two circuit boards assembled in parallel, where charging, precipitation and measurement sections are integrated into one chip, which can detect aerosol particle size in of 30–500 nm, number concentration in range of 5 × 102–5 × 107 /cm3. The average relative errors of the measured aerosol number concentration and the particle size are estimated to be 12.2% and 13.5% respectively. A novel measurement scheme is proposed to actualize a real-time detection of polydisperse particles by successively modulating the measurement voltage and deducing the particle size distribution through a smart data fusion algorithm. The effectiveness of the aerosol sensor is experimentally demonstrated via measurements of polystyrene latex (PSL) aerosol and nucleic acid aerosol, as well as sodium chloride aerosol particles.

[1]  Jakob Löndahl,et al.  A new method for measuring lung deposition efficiency of airborne nanoparticles in a single breath , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[3]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Aerosol Surface Instruments in Transition Regime , 2005 .

[4]  Icrp Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .

[5]  Torsten Tritscher,et al.  NanoScan SMPS ? A Novel, Portable Nanoparticle Sizing and Counting Instrument , 2013 .

[6]  L. Morawska,et al.  A comparison of submicrometer particle dose between Australian and Italian people. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[7]  J. Marra,et al.  Nanoparticle monitoring for exposure assessment , 2009, IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine.

[8]  H. Fissan,et al.  Conceptual limitations and extensions of lung-deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM) , 2009 .

[9]  W. Kreyling,et al.  TRANSLOCATION OF ULTRAFINE INSOLUBLE IRIDIUM PARTICLES FROM LUNG EPITHELIUM TO EXTRAPULMONARY ORGANS IS SIZE DEPENDENT BUT VERY LOW , 2002, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[10]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[11]  Luca Stabile,et al.  Influence of measurement frequency on the evaluation of short-term dose of sub-micrometric particles during indoor and outdoor generation events , 2013 .

[12]  Shankar G. Aggarwal,et al.  A Simplified Approach to Calculate Particle Growth Rate Due to Self-Coagulation, Scavenging and Condensation Using SMPS Measurements during a Particle Growth Event in New Delhi , 2015 .

[13]  Clifford Lau,et al.  Neural Networks: Theoretical Foundations and Analysis , 1991 .

[14]  Mandy Berg,et al.  Aerosol Measurement Principles Techniques And Applications , 2016 .

[15]  B. Weiss,et al.  Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles? , 1995, Inhalation toxicology.

[16]  Matthias Voetz,et al.  Monitor for detecting and assessing exposure to airborne nanoparticles , 2010 .

[17]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  On the performance of the electrical aerosol analyzer , 1975 .

[18]  Thomas A. J. Kuhlbusch,et al.  Comparison of instruments for particle number size distribution measurements in air quality monitoring , 2014 .

[19]  Jungho Hwang,et al.  Real‐Time Measurement of the Size Distribution of Diesel Exhaust Particles using a Portable 4‐stage Electrical Low Pressure Impactor , 2009 .

[20]  Christof Asbach,et al.  How can nanobiotechnology oversight advance science and industry: examples from environmental, health, and safety studies of nanoparticles (nano-EHS) , 2011 .

[21]  O Witschger,et al.  A laboratory study of the performance of the handheld diffusion size classifier (DiSCmini) for various aerosols in the 15-400 nm range. , 2015, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[22]  Naomi Zimmerman,et al.  Comparison of three nanoparticle sizing instruments: The influence of particle morphology , 2014 .

[23]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[24]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier , 2011 .

[25]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Yao-Chuan Lee,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Two Portable and Real-Time Size Distribution Analyzers for Nano/Submicron Aerosol Measurements , 2016 .

[27]  A. Maynard,et al.  Airborne Nanostructured Particles and Occupational Health , 2005 .

[28]  Chao Zhang,et al.  A Micro Aerosol Sensor for the Measurement of Airborne Ultrafine Particles , 2016, Sensors.

[29]  Kaarle Hämeri,et al.  Comparison of nanoparticle measurement instruments for occupational health applications , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[30]  Sara Marini,et al.  Metrological assessment of a portable analyzer for monitoring the particle size distribution of ultrafine particles. , 2014, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[31]  W. MacNee,et al.  Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury , 1998 .