Investigating the impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to help improve reading comprehension in low performing urban elementary schools

In the United States, literacy rates vary between socio-economic groups, and this reading gap is also a common feature in the education systems of OECD member states. To help address this reading gap previous research has identified a number of teaching strategies that have a positive impact on student learning outcomes, including the use of peer collaboration and complex texts. However, the contribution of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning to help address the reading gap for students attending low performing urban elementary schools has, to date, received much less attention and little is known about the ability of young students with access to the Internet to read complex texts in groups and how this impacts on individual reading comprehension scores. This study therefore examines the impact of combining the use of complex texts, collaborative learning and access to the internet on the reading comprehension scores of 58 fourth-grade students (ages 10-11). The students met once a week for an hour over six consecutive weeks and read under the following three conditions: eighth grade level texts independently, eighth grade level texts in groups with internet access and fourth grade level texts in groups with internet access. Our findings demonstrate that groups of young students with access to the internet are capable of reading complex texts with minimal teacher intervention. We also believe that this approach has the potential to help students develop both their offline and online reading comprehension skills.

[1]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: a synthesis of 20 years of research , 2010, Reading and writing.

[2]  I. Mullis,et al.  PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading , 2012 .

[3]  Thérèse Laferrière,et al.  Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[4]  Sean F. Reardon The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor , 2011 .

[5]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 1995, NATO ASI Series.

[6]  T. Shanahan,et al.  The Challenge of Challenging Text. , 2012 .

[7]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[8]  T. Shanahan The National Reading Panel Report. Practical Advice for Teachers. , 2005 .

[9]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: An Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Reading Achievement , 2000 .

[10]  D. Langenberg Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  H. Ross,et al.  “This Bird Can't Do It ‘Cause this Bird Doesn't Swim in Water”: Sibling Teaching During Naturalistic Home Observations in Early Childhood , 2015 .

[13]  Christopher J. Lemons,et al.  Data-Based Individualization in Reading , 2014 .

[14]  Julie Coiro Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities , 2014 .

[15]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  D. Leu,et al.  The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap , 2015 .

[17]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research , 2008 .

[18]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification. , 1991 .

[19]  Y.-J. Shao,et al.  Computer-supported Collaborative Learning for Elementary School Students on the Effectiveness of Reading Comprehension , 2011, ICCE 2011.

[20]  Fred Paas,et al.  Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect , 2011 .

[21]  N. Frey,et al.  Motivating Boys to Read: Inquiry, Modeling, and Choice Matter , 2012 .

[22]  J. Lloyd Eldredge,et al.  Effect of Difficulty Levels on Second-Grade Delayed Readers Using Dyad Reading , 2000 .

[23]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. , 2003 .

[24]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[25]  T. Hungerford How Income Mobility Affects Income Inequality: US Evidence in the 1980s and the 1990s , 2011, Journal of Income Distribution®.

[26]  Melinda Dooly,et al.  Joining Forces: Promoting Metalinguistic Awareness Through Computer-supported Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[27]  S. Strauss,et al.  Teaching Is a Natural Cognitive Ability for Humans , 2012 .

[28]  Gerry Stahl Traversing planes of learning , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[29]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Kathleen A. J. Mohr,et al.  The effects of dyad reading and text difficulty on third-graders’ reading achievement , 2018 .

[31]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  Deanne R. Perez-Granados,et al.  Parents and Siblings as Early Resources for Young Children's Learning in Mexican-Descent Families , 1997 .

[33]  Steven J. Amendum,et al.  Does Text Complexity Matter in the Elementary Grades? A Research Synthesis of Text Difficulty and Elementary Students’ Reading Fluency and Comprehension , 2018 .

[34]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading , 2007 .

[35]  Rachel L. Ruttana,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2018 .

[36]  堀江 祐爾,et al.  アメリカ合衆国における新しい国語科スタンダードに関する研究(2) : Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts(自由研究発表) , 2010 .

[37]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[38]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging From the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies , 2008 .

[39]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Problematizing the Problem , 2003, CSCL.

[40]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Developing Reading Comprehension through Collaborative Learning. , 2014 .

[41]  Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.  Group-to-Individual Problem-Solving Transfer , 2008 .

[42]  T. Koschmann,et al.  The Video Analyst's Manifesto (or The Implications of Garfinkel's Policies for the Development of a Program of Video Analytic Research within the Learning Sciences) , 2004, ICLS.