Alignment of multiradiation isocenters for megavoltage photon beam

The accurate measurement of the linear accelerator (linac) radiation isocenter is critical, especially for stereotactic treatment. Traditional quality assurance (QA) procedure focuses on the measurement of single radiation isocenter, usually of 6 megavoltage (MV) photon beams. Single radiation isocenter is also commonly assumed in treatment planning systems (TPS). Due to different flattening filters and bending magnet and steering parameters, the radiation isocenter of one energy mode can deviate from another if no special effort was devoted. We present the first experience of the multiradiation isocenters alignment on an Elekta linac, as well as its corresponding QA procedure and clinical impact. An 8 mm ball‐bearing (BB) phantom was placed at the 6 MV radiation isocenter using an Elekta isocenter search algorithm, based on portal images. The 3D radiation isocenter shifts of other photon energy modes relative to the 6 MV were determined. Beam profile scanning for different field sizes was used as an independent method to determine the 2D multiradiation isocenters alignment. To quantify the impact of radiation isocenter offset on targeting accuracy, the 10 MV radiation isocenter was manually offset from that for 6 MV by adjusting the bending magnet current. Because our table isocenter was mechanically aligned to the 6 MV radiation isocenter, the deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the "shifted" 10 MV radiation isocenter after bending magnet adjustment was assessed. Winston‐Lutz test was also performed to confirm the overall radiation isocenter positioning accuracy for all photon energies. The portal image method showed the radiation isocenter of the 10 MV flattening filter‐free mode deviated from others before beam parameter adjustment. After the adjustment, the deviation was greatly improved from 0.96 to 0.35 mm relative to the 6 MV radiation isocenter. The same finding was confirmed by the profile‐scanning method. The maximum deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the 10 MV radiation isocenter was observed to linearly increase with the offset between 6 and 10 MV radiation isocenter; 1 mm radiation isocenter offset can translate to almost 2 mm maximum deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the 10 MV radiation isocenter. The alignment of the multiradiation isocenters is particularly important for high‐precision radiotherapy. Our study provides the medical physics community with a quantitative measure of the multiradiation isocenters alignment. A routine QA method should be considered, to examine the radiation isocenters alignment during the linac acceptance. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.56.Fc

[1]  K. Winston,et al.  A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  P J Biggs,et al.  AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group No. 45. , 1994, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. , 1994, Medical physics.

[4]  David A Jaffray,et al.  The stability of mechanical calibration for a kV cone beam computed tomography system integrated with linear accelerator. , 2005, Medical physics.

[5]  J R Sykes,et al.  Measurement of cone beam CT coincidence with megavoltage isocentre and image sharpness using the QUASAR Penta-Guide phantom. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Dosimetric effect of translational and rotational errors for patients undergoing image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  Weiliang Du,et al.  A quality assurance procedure to evaluate cone‐beam CT image center congruence with the radiation isocenter of a linear accelerator , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[9]  M. Schell,et al.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  Earl Nixon,et al.  Development and implementation of an EPID‐based method for localizing isocenter , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Clinical commissioning and use of the Novalis Tx linear accelerator for SRS and SBRT , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  T Solberg,et al.  Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: a multi-institutional study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Juergen Meyer,et al.  Improved accuracy for noncoplanar radiotherapy: an EPID‐based method for submillimeter alignment of linear accelerator table rotation with MV isocenter , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.