Interaction trends between single metal atoms and oxide supports identified with density functional theory and statistical learning

Single-atom catalysts offer high reactivity and selectivity while maximizing utilization of the expensive active metal component. However, they are susceptible to sintering, where single metal atoms agglomerate into thermodynamically stable clusters. Tuning the binding strength between single metal atoms and oxide supports is essential to prevent sintering. We apply density functional theory, together with a statistical learning approach based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, to identify property descriptors that predict interaction strengths between single metal atoms and oxide supports. Here, we show that interfacial binding is correlated with readily available physical properties of both the supported metal, such as oxophilicity measured by oxide formation energy, and the support, such as reducibility measured by oxygen vacancy formation energy. These properties can be used to empirically screen interaction strengths between metal–support pairs, thus aiding the design of single-atom catalysts that are robust against sintering.Predicting metal–support combinations that can afford stable single-atom catalysts remains a complex problem. Now, a computational method is reported that can be used to screen interaction strengths between metals and supports and identify those pairs that generate strongly adsorbed single-atom catalysts.

[1]  J. Vybíral,et al.  Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[2]  Scheffler,et al.  Adsorbate-substrate and adsorbate-adsorbate interactions of Na and K adlayers on Al(111). , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[3]  I. Brown,et al.  The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model , 2002 .

[4]  M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos,et al.  Shape and crystal-plane effects of nanoscale ceria on the activity of Au-CeO2 catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  Zongxian Yang,et al.  Interfacial properties of NM/CeO2(111) (NM = noble metal atoms or clusters of Pd, Pt and Rh): a first principles study , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[6]  D. Cromer,et al.  Orbital Radii of Atoms and Ions , 1965 .

[7]  M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos,et al.  Atomically dispersed supported metal catalysts. , 2012, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[8]  C. Campbell,et al.  Anchored metal nanoparticles: effects of support and size on their energy, sintering resistance and reactivity. , 2013, Faraday discussions.

[9]  Roy E. Welsch,et al.  Descriptors of Oxygen-Evolution Activity for Oxides: A Statistical Evaluation , 2016 .

[10]  I. Hong Quantum Size Effects in Ultrathin Metallic Islands: a Scanning Tunneling Microscopy/Spectroscopy Study , 2009 .

[11]  S. Wanke,et al.  The sintering of supported metal catalysts: II. Comparison of sintering rates of supported Pt, Ir, and Rh catalysts in hydrogen and oxygen , 1978 .

[12]  A. V. van Duin,et al.  Influence of hydroxyls on Pd atom mobility and clustering on rutile TiO(2)(011)-2 × 1. , 2014, ACS nano.

[13]  Chang Won Yoon,et al.  Effects of sintering-resistance and large metal–support interface of alumina nanorod-stabilized Pt nanoparticle catalysts on the improved high temperature water gas shift reaction activity , 2014 .

[14]  Kevin J. Smith,et al.  Deactivation of Pd Catalysts by Water during Low Temperature Methane Oxidation Relevant to Natural Gas Vehicle Converters , 2015 .

[15]  C. Campbell,et al.  Chemical Potential of Metal Atoms in Supported Nanoparticles: Dependence upon Particle Size and Support , 2017 .

[16]  A. Miedema,et al.  Cohesion in alloys — fundamentals of a semi-empirical model , 1980 .

[17]  Singh,et al.  Erratum: Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  Jackson,et al.  Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[19]  M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano,et al.  Evidence for subsurface ordering of oxygen vacancies on the reduced CeO2(111) surface using density-functional and statistical calculations. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[20]  张磊磊闫文盛刘晓艳杨小峰苗澍王文涛王爱琴张涛 刘文刚,et al.  Single-atom dispersed Co–N–C catalyst: structure identification and performance for hydrogenative coupling of nitroarenes , 2017 .

[21]  S. Goumri‐Said,et al.  Evidence of Coulomb correction and spin–orbit coupling in rare-earth dioxides CeO2, PrO2 and TbO2: An ab initio study , 2012 .

[22]  N. Rösch,et al.  Acetylene cyclotrimerization on supported size-selected Pd-n clusters (1 <= n <= 30): one atom is enough! , 2000 .

[23]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  1 . 2 Sparsity : A Reasonable Assumption ? , 2012 .

[24]  G. Pilania,et al.  Machine learning bandgaps of double perovskites , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  L. Giordano,et al.  Bonding of Pd, Ag, and Au atoms on MgO(100) surfaces and MgO/Mo(100) ultra-thin films: A comparative DFT study , 2005 .

[26]  H. Monkhorst,et al.  SPECIAL POINTS FOR BRILLOUIN-ZONE INTEGRATIONS , 1976 .

[27]  Kresse,et al.  Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[28]  S. Hosokawa,et al.  Affinity order among noble metals and CeO2 , 2005 .

[29]  M. Boley,et al.  Uncovering structure-property relationships of materials by subgroup discovery , 2016, 1612.04307.

[30]  J. Contreras,et al.  Sintering of Supported Metal Catalysts , 2012 .

[31]  C. Campbell Catalyst-support interactions: Electronic perturbations. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[32]  Jianmin Chen,et al.  Improved performance of supported single-atom catalysts via increased surface active sites , 2016 .

[33]  Vladimir Cherkassky,et al.  Methods for Regression , 2007 .

[34]  M. Janik,et al.  Examination of oxygen vacancy formation in Mn-doped CeO2 (111) using DFT+U and the hybrid functional HSE06. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[35]  Kanak Roy,et al.  Introducing Time Resolution to Detect Ce3+ Catalytically Active Sites at the Pt/CeO2 Interface through Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[36]  M. Huang,et al.  Thermodynamic, electronic and structural properties of Cu/CeO2 surfaces and interfaces from first-principles DFT+U calculations. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[37]  D. Resasco,et al.  Correlation between catalytic activity and support reducibility in the CO2 reforming of methane over Pt/CexZr1−xO2 catalysts , 2001 .

[38]  Masatake Haruta,et al.  Catalysis of Gold Nanoparticles Deposited on Metal Oxides , 2002 .

[39]  Blöchl,et al.  Projector augmented-wave method. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[40]  A. Márquez,et al.  Cu, Ag and Au atoms deposited on the α-Al2O3(0001) surface: a comparative density functional study , 2005 .

[41]  Wei Chen,et al.  Predicting defect behavior in B2 intermetallics by merging ab initio modeling and machine learning , 2016, npj Computational Materials.

[42]  Ping Liu,et al.  A new type of strong metal-support interaction and the production of H2 through the transformation of water on Pt/CeO2(111) and Pt/CeO(x)/TiO2(110) catalysts. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[43]  Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos,et al.  Charging and Chemical Reactivity of Gold Nanoparticles and Adatoms on the (111) Surface of Single-Crystal Magnetite: A Scanning Tunneling Microscopy/Spectroscopy Study , 2009 .

[44]  D. Goodman,et al.  Onset of catalytic activity of gold clusters on titania with the appearance of nonmetallic properties , 1998, Science.

[45]  B. D. Chandler,et al.  Strong metal-support interactions: An extra layer of complexity. , 2017, Nature chemistry.

[46]  P. Flynn,et al.  The Sintering of Supported Metal Catalysts , 1975 .

[47]  Emily A. Carter,et al.  Adsorption of Al, O, Hf, Y, Pt, and S Atoms on α-Al2O3(0001) , 2007 .

[48]  James J. Harynuk,et al.  Classifying Crystal Structures of Binary Compounds AB through Cluster Resolution Feature Selection and Support Vector Machine Analysis , 2016 .

[49]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Single-atom dispersed Co–N–C catalyst: structure identification and performance for hydrogenative coupling of nitroarenes , 2016, Chemical science.

[50]  V. Zhdanov Ostwald ripening of charged supported metal nanoparticles: Schottky model , 2015 .

[51]  A. Bloch,et al.  Quantum-Defect Electronegativity Scale for Nontransition Elements , 1974 .

[52]  C. Humphreys,et al.  Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study , 1998 .

[53]  M. Janik,et al.  Methane Activation and Oxygen Vacancy Formation over CeO2 and Zr, Pd Substituted CeO2 Surfaces , 2008 .

[54]  T. Mallouk,et al.  Charge Transfer Stabilization of Late Transition Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on a Layered Niobate Support. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[55]  F. Illas,et al.  Density Functional Theory Study of the Interaction of Cu, Ag, and Au Atoms with the Regular CeO2 (111) Surface , 2010 .

[56]  A. K. Mohanty,et al.  A First Principles Study , 2012 .

[57]  C. Campbell,et al.  Anchored Metal Nanoparticles: Effects of Support and Size on Their Energy, Sintering Resistance and Reactivity , 2013 .

[58]  Czech Republic,et al.  Learning physical descriptors for materials science by compressed sensing , 2016, 1612.04285.

[59]  V. Melnikov,et al.  Theoretical investigations of 3d-metal adsorption on the α-AL2O3 (0001) surface , 2011 .

[60]  A. Langner Statistical Evaluation , 1966, The Mathematical Gazette.

[61]  Alex Zunger,et al.  Systematization of the stable crystal structure of all AB-type binary compounds: A pseudopotential orbital-radii approach , 1980 .

[62]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[63]  C. Campbell The energetics of supported metal nanoparticles: relationships to sintering rates and catalytic activity. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[64]  C. Campbell,et al.  Trends in Adhesion Energies of Metal Nanoparticles on Oxide Surfaces: Understanding Support Effects in Catalysis and Nanotechnology. , 2017, ACS nano.

[65]  S. C. Fung,et al.  Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide , 1978 .

[66]  Xiaoqing Pan,et al.  Adsorbate-mediated strong metal-support interactions in oxide-supported Rh catalysts. , 2017, Nature chemistry.