Hard limits on robust control over delayed and quantized communication channels with applications to sensorimotor control

The modern view of the nervous system as layering distributed computation and communication for the purpose of sensorimotor control and homeostasis has much experimental evidence but little theoretical foundation, leaving unresolved the connection between diverse components and complex behavior. As a simple starting point, we address a fundamental tradeoff when robust control is done using communication with both delay and quantization error, which are both extremely heterogeneous and highly constrained in human and animal nervous systems. This yields surprisingly simple and tight analytic bounds with clear interpretations and insights regarding hard tradeoffs, optimal coding and control strategies, and their relationship with well known physiology and behavior. These results are similar to reasoning routinely used informally by experimentalists to explain their findings, but very different from those based on information theory and statistical physics (which have dominated theoretical neuroscience). The simple analytic results and their proofs extend to more general models at the expense of less insight and nontrivial (but still scalable) computation. They are also relevant, though less dramatically, to certain cyber-physical systems.

[1]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Feedback Control in the Presence of Noisy Channels: “Bode-Like” Fundamental Limitations of Performance , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Peter Sterling,et al.  Principles of Neural Design , 2015 .

[3]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Feedback Control Under Data Rate Constraints: An Overview , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Nikolai Matni Communication Delay Co-Design in $\mathcal{ H}_{2}$-Distributed Control Using Atomic Norm Minimization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[5]  M. Dahleh,et al.  Control of Uncertain Systems: A Linear Programming Approach , 1995 .

[6]  Nuno C. Martins,et al.  Information structures in optimal decentralized control , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[7]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[8]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Understanding Vision: Theory, Models, and Data , 2014 .

[9]  Nikolai Matni,et al.  Localized LQR optimal control , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Yorie Nakahira,et al.  A linear programming framework for networked control system design , 2015 .

[11]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[12]  David J. Stone,et al.  Robust efficiency and actuator saturation explain healthy heart rate control and variability , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Venkat Chandrasekaran,et al.  Regularization for design , 2016, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Sanjay Lall,et al.  A Characterization of Convex Problems in Decentralized Control$^ast$ , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Gentian Buzi,et al.  Glycolytic Oscillations and Limits on Robust Efficiency , 2011, Science.

[16]  David W. Franklin,et al.  Computational Mechanisms of Sensorimotor Control , 2011, Neuron.