A modern mechanization of a classical adaptive control concept is presented with an application to launch vehicle attitude control systems. Due to a rigorous flight certification environment, many adaptive control concepts are infeasible when applied to high-risk aerospace systems; methods of stability analysis are either intractable for high complexity models or cannot be reconciled in light of classical requirements. Furthermore, many adaptive techniques appearing in the literature are not suitable for application to conditionally stable systems with complex flexible-body dynamics, as is often the case with launch vehicles. The present technique is a multiplicative forward loop gain adaptive law similar to that used for the NASA X-15 flight research vehicle. In digital implementation with several novel features, it is well-suited to application on aerodynamically unstable launch vehicles with thrust vector control via augmentation of the baseline attitude/attitude-rate feedback control scheme. The approach is compatible with standard design features of autopilots for launch vehicles, including phase stabilization of lateral bending and slosh via linear filters. In addition, the method of assessing flight control stability via classical gain and phase margins is not affected under reasonable assumptions. The algorithm s ability to recover from certain unstable operating regimes can in fact be understood in terms of frequency-domain criteria. Finally, simulation results are presented that confirm the ability of the algorithm to improve performance and robustness in realistic failure scenarios.
[1]
Arthur L. Greensite.
Analysis and Design of Space Vehicle Flight Control Systems. Volume I - Short Period Dynamics
,
1967
.
[2]
Milton 0.Thompson.
FLIGHT TEST EXPERIENCE WITH ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS
,
2002
.
[3]
Eric Gilligan.
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Controls Systems Design and Analysis Branch
,
2014
.
[4]
J. Zvara,et al.
Structural interaction with control systems
,
1971
.
[5]
Jeb S. Orr.
Elastic Model Transitions Using Quadratic Inequality Constrained Least Squares
,
2012
.
[6]
Jeb S. Orr,et al.
A Flight Dynamics Model for a Multi-Actuated Flexible Rocket Vehicle
,
2011
.
[7]
nasa.
Experience with the X-15 adaptive flight control system
,
2013
.
[8]
J. Hanson,et al.
A Plan for Advanced Guidance and Control Technology for 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicles
,
2002
.
[9]
Roger D. Launius,et al.
Flight Research: Problems Encountered and What They Should Teach Us
,
2012
.
[10]
Jeb S. Orr,et al.
State Space Implementation of Linear Perturbation Dynamics Equations for Flexible Launch Vehicles
,
2009
.
[11]
Jeb S. Orr,et al.
Elastic Model Transitions Using Quadratic Inequality Constrained Least Squares
,
2012
.
[12]
Charles E. Hall,et al.
Learning About Ares I from Monte Carlo Simulation
,
2008
.
[13]
A R Jonsen,et al.
Do no harm.
,
1978,
Annals of internal medicine.
[14]
James Frosch,et al.
Saturn AS-501/S-IC flight control system design.
,
1967
.