Fast feature-preserving speckle reduction for ultrasound images via phase congruency

Ultrasonography is widely used in clinical diagnosis and therapeutic procedures, but speckle noise often obscures important features and complicates interpretation and analysis of ultrasound images. In this regard, speckle reduction is a crucial prerequisite of many computer aided ultrasound diagnosis and treatment systems However, removing speckle noise while simultaneously preserving features in ultrasound images is a challenging task. We propose a novel optimization framework for speckle reduction by leveraging the concept of phase congruency and incorporating a feature asymmetry metric into the regularization term of the objective function to effectively distinguish the features and speckle noise. The feature asymmetry metric can productively separate features from speckle noise by analyzing the local frequency information. Compared with traditional methods employing intensity gradients as regularization terms, our framework is invariant to the intensity amplitude of features so that low contrast features are almost equally protected as high contrast features. In addition, rather than adopting the gradient descent, we propose a novel solver by decomposing the original non-convex optimization into solving several linear systems, leading to an efficient solution of the optimization. Owing to different penalties on speckle noise and features, our method can efficiently remove speckle noise and preserve features at the same time. Experiments on simulated and real ultrasound images demonstrate our method can better maintain features with speckle removal than state-of-the-art methods, especially for the low contrast features. HighlightsWe propose a novel optimization framework for speckle reduction by leveraging the concept of phase congruency and incorporating a feature asymmetry metric into the regularization term of the objective function to effectively distinguish the features and speckle noise.We propose a novel solver by decomposing the original nonconvex optimization into solving several linear systems, leading to an efficient solution of the optimization.Compared with traditional methods employing intensity gradients as regularization terms, our framework is invariant to the intensity amplitude of features so that low contrast features are almost equally protected as high contrast features.

[1]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Nonlinear Diffusion in Laplacian Pyramid Domain for Ultrasonic Speckle Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[5]  Martin Styner,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ganapathi Subramanian,et al.  Adaptive wavelet packet-based de-speckling of ultrasound images with bilateral filter. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Jinglu Tan,et al.  Ultrasound speckle reduction by a SUSAN-controlled anisotropic diffusion method , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Khalifa Djemal,et al.  A new speckle filtering method for ultrasound images based on a weighted multiplicative total variation , 2014, Signal Process..

[9]  L Leija,et al.  Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  Xiang Zhu,et al.  Automatic Parameter Selection for Denoising Algorithms Using a No-Reference Measure of Image Content , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the estimation of the coefficient of variation for anisotropic diffusion speckle filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  2D+T acoustic boundary detection in echocardiography , 2000, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Antonio Fernando Catelli Infantosi,et al.  Breast ultrasound despeckling using anisotropic diffusion guided by texture descriptors. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Michael Felsberg,et al.  The monogenic signal , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Chunming Li,et al.  Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution and Its Application to Image Segmentation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Yuxuan Wang,et al.  Completely automated segmentation approach for breast ultrasound images using multiple-domain features. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Petia Radeva,et al.  SRBF: Speckle reducing bilateral filtering. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  Alin Achim,et al.  Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Fritz Albregtsen,et al.  Segmentation of ultrasound images of liver tumors applying snake algorithms and GVF , 2005 .

[21]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Segmentation and Classification of Breast Tumor Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images , 2007, MICCAI.

[24]  Marcos Martin-Fernandez,et al.  Anisotropic Diffusion Filter With Memory Based on Speckle Statistics for Ultrasound Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Gang Wang,et al.  Tree Filtering: Efficient Structure-Preserving Smoothing With a Minimum Spanning Tree , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Mach bands are phase dependent , 1986, Nature.

[28]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Rayleigh-Maximum-Likelihood Filtering for Speckle Reduction of Ultrasound Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Jie Huang,et al.  Fast reduction of speckle noise in real ultrasound images , 2013, Signal Process..

[31]  Cewu Lu,et al.  Image smoothing via L0 gradient minimization , 2011, ACM Trans. Graph..

[32]  Raanan Fattal,et al.  Diffusion maps for edge-aware image editing , 2010, SIGGRAPH 2010.

[33]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[34]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Symmetry and Asymmetry from Local Phase , 1997 .

[35]  Robyn A. Owens,et al.  Feature detection from local energy , 1987, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[36]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[37]  K. Kirk Shung,et al.  Non-Rigid Ultrasound Image Registration Based on Intensity and Local Phase Information , 2008, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[38]  Thomas L. Szabo,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out , 2004 .

[39]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Methodology for evaluating image-segmentation algorithms , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[40]  Ahror Belaid,et al.  Phase based level set segmentation of ultrasound images , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[41]  Michael Brady,et al.  On the Choice of Band-Pass Quadrature Filters , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[42]  Manish Khare,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using Daubechies complex wavelet transform , 2010, Signal Process..

[43]  D Boukerroui,et al.  Enhancement of contrast regions in suboptimal ultrasound images with application to echocardiography. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[45]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Ultrasound Despeckling for Contrast Enhancement , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[46]  Xuming Zhang,et al.  Nonlocal means method using weight refining for despeckling of ultrasound images , 2014, Signal Process..

[47]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Edge Detection and Ridge Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[48]  Zeev Farbman,et al.  Edge-preserving decompositions for multi-scale tone and detail manipulation , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[49]  E. Nezry,et al.  Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity , 1990 .