Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect.

There has been much debate concerning whether startling sensory stimuli can activate a fast-neural pathway for movement triggering (StartReact) which is different from that of voluntary movements. Activity in sternocleidomastoid (SCM) electromyogram is suggested to indicate activation of this pathway. We evaluated whether SCM activity can accurately identify trials which may differ in their neurophysiological triggering and assessed the use of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of reaction time (RT) data to identify trials with the shortest RTs for analysis. Using recent datasets from the StartReact literature, we examined the relationship between RT and SCM activity. We categorised data into short/longer RT bins using CDFs and used linear mixed effects models to compare potential conclusions that can be drawn when categorising data on the basis of RT versus on the basis of SCM activity. The capacity of SCM to predict RT is task-specific, making it an unreliable indicator of distinct neurophysiological mechanisms. Classification of trials using CDFs is capable of capturing potential task- or muscle- related differences in triggering whilst avoiding the pitfalls of the traditional SCM activity based classification method. We conclude that SCM activity is not always evident on trials that show the early triggering of movements seen in the StartReact phenomenon. We further propose that a more comprehensive analysis of data may be achieved through the inclusion of CDF analyses. These findings have implications for future research investigating movement triggering as well as for potential therapeutic applications of StartReact.

[1]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Startle and the StartReact Effect: Physiological Mechanisms. , 2019, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[2]  D. Pins,et al.  On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron’s law and choice reaction time , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  C. Chiu,et al.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect , 2014, Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Rugy,et al.  The early release of actions by loud sounds in muscles with distinct connectivity , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[6]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  J C Rothwell,et al.  New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  J. Dickey,et al.  Bayes factors for independence in contingency tables , 1974 .

[9]  P. M. Hartigan,et al.  Computation of the Dip Statistic to Test for Unimodality , 1985 .

[10]  C. MacKinnon,et al.  Early and Unintentional Release of Planned Motor Actions during Motor Cortical Preparation , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Prepared Movements Are Elicited Early by Startle , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Claire F. Honeycutt,et al.  Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Tolosa,et al.  Effects of a startling acoustic stimulus on reaction time in different parkinsonian syndromes , 1998, Neurology.

[14]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[15]  S. Riek,et al.  The effect of attention on the release of anticipatory timing actions. , 2014, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  A. de Rugy,et al.  Action history influences subsequent movement via two distinct processes , 2017, eLife.

[17]  R. Whelan Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data , 2008 .

[18]  Stuart N. Baker,et al.  Fractionation of muscle activity in rapid responses to startling cues , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  O. Lipp,et al.  Reaction time facilitation by acoustic task-irrelevant stimuli is not related to startle , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Albert Bayesian Testing and Estimation of Association in a Two-Way Contingency Table , 1997 .

[23]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation , 2015, Physiological reports.

[26]  A. Mayr,et al.  Evidence for Startle Effects due to Externally Induced Lower Limb Movements: Implications in Neurorehabilitation , 2017, BioMed research international.

[27]  S. Riek,et al.  The facilitation of motor actions by acoustic and electric stimulation. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Aaron N. McInnes,et al.  Neural gain induced by startling acoustic stimuli is additive to preparatory activation. , 2020, Psychophysiology.

[29]  M. Kofler,et al.  StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion , 2018, PloS one.

[30]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2015 .

[31]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Startling acoustic stimuli elicit rapid hand extension following stroke , 2014 .

[33]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Sample Quantiles in Statistical Packages , 1996 .

[34]  S. Riek,et al.  Unexpected acoustic stimulation during action preparation reveals gradual re-specification of movement direction , 2017, Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Claire F. Honeycutt,et al.  Startle evoked movement is delayed in older adults: implications for brainstem processing in the elderly , 2014, Physiological reports.

[37]  Claire F. Honeycutt,et al.  Startle evokes nearly identical movements in multi-jointed, two-dimensional reaching tasks , 2018, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: Evidence from startle , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  Jörg Müller,et al.  Auditory startle responses as a probe of brainstem function in healthy subjects and patients with movement disorders. , 2006, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  C. MacKinnon,et al.  Preparation of anticipatory postural adjustments prior to stepping. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  S. Riek,et al.  Triggering Mechanisms for Motor Actions: The Effects of Expectation on Reaction Times to Intense Acoustic Stimuli , 2018, Neuroscience.

[43]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Triggering prepared actions by sudden sounds: reassessing the evidence for a single mechanism , 2016, Acta physiologica.

[44]  B. R. Bloem,et al.  Are postural responses to backward and forward perturbations processed by different neural circuits? , 2013, Neuroscience.

[45]  R. Chua,et al.  First trial and StartReact effects induced by balance perturbations to upright stance. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[47]  I. Franks,et al.  The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  C. MacKinnon,et al.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  D L Kohfeld,et al.  Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.