Robot Companions as Case-Scenario for Assessing the “Subjectivity” of Autonomous Agents. Some Philosophical and Legal Remarks

In this paper the European flagship project proposal Robot Companion for Citizens (RCC), grounded on the idea of developing robot companions for citizens, is taken as a case scenario for investigating the feasibility of ascribing rights and duties to autonomous robots from a legal and philosophical standpoint. In talking about rights and duties with respect to robots endowed with autonomous decision capabilities, one should face the implications that inevitably these terms rise, especially in the field of law. The paper points out the technological problems related to the application of the notion of duty to robots and the problems deriving from attributing a legal subjectivity to nonhuman entities such as robot.

[1]  Colin Allen,et al.  Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[2]  Giorgio Oppo Ancora su persona umana e diritto , 2007 .

[3]  Andreas Matthias,et al.  The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[4]  R. M. Hare Freedom and reason , 1964 .

[5]  David Fraser,et al.  Identifying and preventing pain in animals , 2006 .

[6]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Formal Theory of Creativity, Fun, and Intrinsic Motivation (1990–2010) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[7]  Jason Borenstein,et al.  Robot caregivers: harbingers of expanded freedom for all? , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[8]  Gianmarco Veruggio,et al.  Roboethics: Social and Ethical Implications of Robotics , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[9]  Thomas Reid,et al.  Essays on the active powers of man, 1788 , 1977 .

[10]  Francesco Donato Busnelli L'inizio della vita umana , 2004 .

[11]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Machine Ethics , 2011 .

[12]  Leon Sterling,et al.  The Art of Agent-Oriented Modeling , 2009 .

[13]  Hillary Moses Daluz Relevant Publications , 2021, Courtroom Testimony for Fingerprint Examiners.

[14]  John P. Sullins RoboWarfare: can robots be more ethical than humans on the battlefield? , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Roboethics in Biorobotics : Discussion of Case Studies , 2007 .

[16]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent , 2007, AI Mag..

[17]  Patrick Lin,et al.  Robotic Warfare: Some Challenges in Moving from Noncivilian to Civilian Theaters , 2012 .

[18]  Guglielmo Tamburrini,et al.  Ethical reflections on health care robotics , 2009 .

[19]  Roger Scruton,et al.  Animal rights and wrongs , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Matthew Scully,et al.  Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy , 2002 .

[21]  Kasper Stoy,et al.  Self-Reconfigurable Robots: An Introduction , 2010 .

[22]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Toward the Human–Robot Co-Existence Society: On Safety Intelligence for Next Generation Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[23]  E. Said,et al.  The Tanner Lectures on Human Values , 1997 .

[24]  David J. Calverley,et al.  Imagining a non-biological machine as a legal person , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[25]  H. Tristam Engelhardt,et al.  Some Persons are Humans, some Humans are Persons, and the World is what We Persons Make of it , 1977 .

[26]  James A. Harris,et al.  Thomas Reid - Essays on the Active Powers of Man , 2010 .

[27]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Morphological computation for adaptive behavior and cognition , 2006 .

[28]  George A. Bekey,et al.  Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[29]  S. Lehman-Wilzig Frankenstein unbound: Towards a legal definition of artificial intelligence☆ , 1981 .

[30]  L. Munari How the body shapes the way we think — a new view of intelligence , 2009 .

[31]  René von Schomberg,et al.  From the ethics of technology towards an ethics of knowledge policy: implications for robotics , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[32]  Patrick Lin,et al.  Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics , 2011 .

[33]  Pericle Salvini,et al.  Peccioli: The Testing Site for the Robot DustCart. Focus on socialand legal challenges , 2011 .

[34]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Autonomous bidding agents - strategies and lessons from the trading agent competition , 2007 .

[35]  Anthony Kulis,et al.  Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence: Theories, Methods, and Technologies , 2009, Scalable Comput. Pract. Exp..

[36]  N. Sharkey,et al.  The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal , 2010 .

[37]  Silvia Bagni Il concetto di persona tra bioetica e diritto , 2013 .

[38]  I. Duncan,et al.  The changing concept of animal sentience , 2006 .