Microvascular perfusion 1 week and 6 months after myocardial infarction by first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Objective: To characterise the evolution of myocardial perfusion during the first 6 months after myocardial infarction by first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and determine its significance. Design: Prospective cohort design. Setting: Single-centre study in a teaching hospital in Spain. Patients: 40 patients with a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction, single-vessel disease and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow (stent in 33 patients) underwent rest and low-dose dobutamine CMR 7 (SD 1) and 184 (SD 11) days after infarction. Microvascular perfusion was assessed at rest by visual assessment and quantitative analysis of first-pass perfusion CMR. Of the 640 segments, 290 segments subtended by the infarct-related artery (IRA) were focused on. Results: Both 1 week and 6 months after infarction, segments with normal perfusion showed more wall thickening, contractile reserve and wall thickness, and less transmural necrosis, p <0.05 in all cases. Of 76 hypoperfused segments at the first week, 47 (62%) normalised perfusion at the sixth month. However, 42 segments (14% of the whole group) showed chronic abnormal perfusion; these segments showed worse CMR indices in the late phase (p<0.05 in all cases). Conclusions: In patients with an open IRA, more than half of the segments with abnormal perfusion at the first week are normally perfused after six months. First-pass perfusion CMR shows that in a small percentage of segments, abnormal perfusion may become a chronic phenomenon—these areas have a more severe deterioration of systolic function, wall thickness, contractile reserve and the transmural extent of necrosis.

[1]  David C. Sheridan,et al.  Resting Myocardial Blood Flow Is Impaired in Hibernating Myocardium: A Magnetic Resonance Study of Quantitative Perfusion Assessment , 2005, Circulation.

[2]  J. Núñez,et al.  Usefulness of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment for predicting recovery of left ventricular wall motion in the setting of myocardial stunning. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Núñez,et al.  Significance of exercise-induced ST segment elevation in Q leads in patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an open infarct-related artery Analysis with angiography, intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  V. Bodí,et al.  Usefulness of quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography to analyze microvasculature perfusion in patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an open infarct-related artery: comparison with intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2005, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  J. Lima,et al.  Very early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for quantification of myocardial tissue perfusion in patients receiving tirofiban before percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2005, American heart journal.

[6]  H. Kestler,et al.  Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, European heart journal.

[7]  J. Schulz-Menger,et al.  Detection of Acutely Impaired Microvascular Reperfusion After Infarct Angioplasty With Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Circulation.

[8]  Nicole Heussen,et al.  Prediction of clinical outcome after mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction by markers of myocardial reperfusion. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  E. Braunwald Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: historical context and future promise , 2002 .

[10]  J Knuuti,et al.  Multimodality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability: combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG PET-initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[11]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Quantification and time course of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[13]  M. Hori,et al.  Temporal changes in myocardial perfusion patterns in patients with reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Their relation to myocardial viability. , 1995, Circulation.

[14]  A. Kitabatake,et al.  Lack of Myocardial Perfusion Immediately After Successful Thrombolysis: A Predictor of Poor Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Anterior Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[15]  L. Shaw,et al.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Clinical Indications for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (cmr): Consensus Panel Report , 2022 .

[16]  Katherine C. Wu Myocardial perfusion imaging by magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Current cardiology reports.

[17]  W. Hundley,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cardiac function , 2003, Current cardiology reports.

[18]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging , 1992 .