External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: Evidence from China's high-tech firms

Abstract Based on a dichotomy of knowledge content, this study examines how two types of external learning (i.e. technical and administrative learning) affect radical innovation, and assesses how such effects are conditional on two types of market dynamics (i.e. technological turbulence and competitive intensity). A survey of 183 high-tech firms in China shows that both technical and administrative learning facilitate development of radical innovation. Further, technological turbulence reduces the effect of technical learning but enhances the effect of administrative learning on radical innovation, whereas competitive intensity enhances the effect of technical learning but reduces the effect of administrative learning on radical innovation.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Market-oriented organizations in an emerging economy: A study of missing links , 2003 .

[3]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[4]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[5]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[6]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[7]  Xueming Luo,et al.  The role of top management networks for market knowledge creation and sharing in China , 2009 .

[8]  Laura B. Cardinal.  Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[9]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[10]  D. Dougherty,et al.  The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms , 1994 .

[11]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[12]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[13]  Richard DeMartino,et al.  Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms, Journal of Product , 2006 .

[14]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[15]  K. Zhou,et al.  How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies , 2010 .

[16]  G. Day.  Continuous Learning about Markets , 1994 .

[17]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior , 1997 .

[18]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[19]  C. Gilbert.  Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[20]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of "organizational lag." , 1984 .

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  K. Zhou,et al.  Organizational changes in emerging economies: drivers and consequences , 2006 .

[23]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms , 2001 .

[24]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[25]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[26]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance , 1999 .

[27]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change , 2000 .

[28]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[29]  Y. Bao.  Organizational resistance to performance‐enhancing technological innovations: a motivation‐threat‐ability framework , 2009 .

[30]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification , 2008 .

[31]  P. Berthon,et al.  Market Orientation, Generative Learning, Innovation Strategy and Business Performance Inter-Relationships in Bioscience Firms , 2008 .

[32]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[33]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[34]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[35]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[36]  Dae Ryun Chang,et al.  Organizational memory influences new product success , 2008 .

[37]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[38]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The desired level of market orientation and business unit performance , 2009 .

[39]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[40]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? , 1998 .

[41]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How management innovation happens , 2006 .

[42]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[43]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[44]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Organizing for external technology exploitation in diversified firms , 2010 .

[45]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[46]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[47]  Per Vagn Freytag,et al.  When do firms invest in offensive and/or defensive marketing? , 2009 .

[48]  Rajesh Chandy,et al.  Radical Innovation across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture , 2009 .

[49]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  Competitive Density and the Customer Acquisition–Retention Trade-Off: , 2008 .

[50]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[51]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[52]  Alice C. Stewart,et al.  A Contingency Perspective on Organizational Learning: Integrating Environmental Context, Organizational Learning Processes, and Types of Learning , 2003 .

[53]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[54]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[55]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Organizing competitor analysis systems , 1991 .

[56]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  The Nature of Organizational Search in High Technology Markets , 1993 .

[57]  S. Dutta,et al.  Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability , 2004 .

[58]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[59]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  Market Orientation and the New Product Paradox. , 2005 .

[60]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[61]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .