Public policy and financial resource mobilization for wind energy in developing countries: A comparison of approaches and outcomes in China and India

Abstract We analyze and contrast how China and India mobilized financial resources to build domestic technological innovation systems in wind energy. To that end, we identify distinct stages of technology diffusion in the two countries in the period 1986–2012, and analyze the interplay between public policies and the development of the technological innovation system across the different stages. We show that the two countries’ distinct development strategies for wind energy – China developed wind energy largely through its state-owned enterprises, while India opened up wind energy investment to the private sector in the early 1990s – influenced system outcomes in terms of technology diffusion, domestic industry structure, competitiveness, and ownership. By unraveling the interplay between public policies, investment risks and returns, and actor characteristics, we explain the differences in system outcomes and identify important policy trade-offs between the two strategies. Our analysis provides novel insights about the process of financial resource mobilization in technological innovation systems, the dynamics of innovation-system growth, and the policy trade-offs that must be reconciled by countries that aim to promote the diffusion of a particular technology.

[1]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Feasible mitigation actions in developing countries , 2014 .

[2]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  REGULATORY DESIGN FOR RES-E SUPPORT MECHANISMS: LEARNING CURVES, MARKET STRUCTURE, AND BURDEN-SHARING , 2012 .

[3]  J. Huenteler.  International Support for Feed-In Tariffs in Developing Countries – A Review and Analysis of Proposed Mechanisms , 2014 .

[4]  P. Bardhan.  Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay , 2006 .

[5]  Q. Ye,et al.  What Drives Wind and Solar Energy Investment in India and China , 2014 .

[6]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel , 2010 .

[7]  Hongxia Sun,et al.  A large amount of idle capacity under rapid expansion: Policy analysis on the dilemma of wind power utilization in China , 2014 .

[8]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[9]  B. Girod,et al.  Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power , 2014 .

[10]  Lan Xue,et al.  China's policy initiatives for the development of wind energy technology , 2015 .

[11]  D. Popp,et al.  The Learning Process and Technological Change in Wind Power: Evidence from China&Apos;S CDM Wind Projects , 2014 .

[12]  D. Rodrik.  One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth , 2007 .

[13]  Ingrid Mignon,et al.  Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research , 2013 .

[14]  Jesse D. Jenkins,et al.  A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility? , 2015 .

[15]  Joanna I. Lewis.  Building a national wind turbine industry: experiences from China, India and South Korea , 2011 .

[16]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[17]  Yonglong Lu,et al.  From lagging to leading? Technological innovation systems in emerging economies and the case of Chinese wind power , 2013 .

[18]  S. Jolly,et al.  Collective institutional entrepreneurship and contestations in wind energy in India , 2015 .

[19]  M. Stadelmann,et al.  De-risking concentrated solar power in emerging markets: The role of policies and international finance institutions , 2015 .

[20]  Qian Wang,et al.  Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms ☆ , 2008 .

[21]  Laura Diaz Anadon,et al.  The price of wind power in China during its expansion: Technology adoption, learning-by-doing, economies of scale, and manufacturing localization , 2012 .

[22]  D. Rodrik,et al.  From “Hindu Growth” to Productivity Surge: The Mystery of the Indian Growth Transition , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  G. Shrimali,et al.  Renewable deployment in India: Financing costs and implications for policy , 2013 .

[24]  K. Ganesan,et al.  Assessing Green Industrial Policy The India experience , 2014 .

[25]  M. Vijayabaskar,et al.  Industrial Dynamics in China and India , 2011 .

[26]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[27]  Joanna I. Lewis,et al.  Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms , 2007 .

[28]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[29]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Why space matters in technological innovation systems – the global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology , 2014 .

[30]  M. McElroy,et al.  Potential for Wind-Generated Electricity in China , 2009, Science.

[31]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Using the Federal Production Tax Credit to Build a Durable Market for Wind Power in the United States , 2007 .

[32]  Florian Taübe,et al.  Exploring technology diffusion in emerging markets – the role of public policy for wind energy , 2014 .

[33]  Kersti Karltorp.  SCALING UP RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES - The role of resource mobilisation in the growth of technological innovation systems , 2014 .

[34]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research , 2012 .

[35]  Jun Su,et al.  Behind the development of technology: The transition of innovation modes in China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry , 2012 .

[36]  Joanna I. Lewis.  Green Innovation in China: China's Wind Power Industry and the Global Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy , 2012 .

[37]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  An analysis of remote electric mini-grids in Laos using the Technological Innovation Systems approach , 2015 .

[38]  T. Schmidt.  Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking , 2014 .

[39]  F. Geels.  Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[40]  T. Khanna,et al.  Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets , 1997 .

[41]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[42]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[43]  Ling Zhang,et al.  An over painted oriental arts: Evaluation of the development of the Chinese renewable energy market using the wind power market as a model , 2009 .

[44]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[45]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  Derisking Renewable Energy Investment. A Framework to Support Policymakers in Selecting Public Instruments to Promote Renewable Energy Investment in Developing Countries , 2013 .

[46]  Yonglong Lu,et al.  Prospects for global market expansion of China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry , 2014 .

[47]  T. Khanna,et al.  Strategies that fit emerging markets. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[48]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[49]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Financing energy access and off-grid electrification: A review of status, options and challenges , 2013 .

[50]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[51]  G. Nemet.  Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .