The effects of farrowing nest size and width on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival

The `Werribee farrowing pen' (WFP) was developed as a loose housing alternative to the farrowing crate. The WFP occupies about twice the space of a crate and comprises two compartments, a `nest' and a `non-nest' area. In this experiment, we investigated the effects of reducing total pen space by modifying the dimensions of the `nest'. The hypothesis was that modifying `nest' size and width would not negatively affect piglet survival. A reduction in total floor space in the WFP may increase attractiveness for adoption of the system by pig producers. The experiment had a 2×2 factorial design with nine replicates and a total of 72 primiparous sows (Large White×Landrace) and their litters. All subjects were included to day 4 of lactation, but production data to weaning (day 23) was restricted to 36 litters. We examined the effects of `nest' size (large: L vs. small: S) and width (wide: W vs. narrow: N) on sow and piglet behaviours and piglet survival. The W, as compared to N treatment sows, had longer mean bouts of standing in the `nest' during 16–8 h pre-farrowing (3.7 vs. 2.0 min, P<0.01), suggesting that pre-farrowing (`nesting') behaviour may have been adversely affected by narrow nest width. On the first 2 days of lactation, sow suckling grunts occurred more in the W than N treatment (14.1 and 8.0% of observations, P<0.01). However, this was due to an approximately 50% lower incidence in the SN treatment, as compared to the other treatments combined (5.9 and 12.7%). Piglets spent more (P<0.01) time at the udder in L vs. S (41 and 30%) and W vs. N nests (40 and 31%) and performed more (P<0.05) sucking behaviour (i.e., drinking milk from a teat) in L vs. S nests (2.5 and 1.2%). These differences were due to SN treatment litters sucking less than other treatments combined (0.9 vs. 2.2%). Of the 680 piglets born (n=72 litters), 3.8% were stillborn and 6.8% died between birth and day 4 of lactation. From day 5 to weaning (n=36 litters), 3.5% of piglets died, all due to Escherichia coli infection. While there were no effects of treatment on piglet survival, liveborn piglets were less likely (P<0.05) to die from E. coli in the L vs. S treatments (9/24 vs. 23/33 piglets). In conclusion, our results provide evidence that the size and width of the farrowing `nest' in a loose farrowing system may effect sow and piglet behaviours that may be relevant to piglet survival.

[1]  B. Algers Health, behaviour and welfare of outdoor pigs , 1994 .

[2]  G. Cronin,et al.  The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactation , 1996 .

[3]  Judith K. Blackshaw,et al.  Getting-Up and Lying-Down Behaviours of Loose- Housed Sows and Social Contacts Between Sows and Piglets During Day 1 and Day 8 After Parturition , 1990 .

[4]  G. V. Putten,et al.  Vulva biting in group-housed sows: Preliminary report , 1990 .

[5]  K. Bøe Maternal behaviour of lactating sows in a loosehousing system , 1993 .

[6]  J. Matthews,et al.  Demonstration and characterization of a transport system capable of lysine and leucine absorption that is encoded for in porcine jejunal epithelium by expression of mRNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes. , 1996, Journal of Animal Science.

[7]  Beat Wechsler,et al.  Individual differences in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and the crushing of piglets , 1997 .

[8]  D. Arey,et al.  Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates , 1996 .

[9]  T. Widowski,et al.  The influence of straw, cloth tassel, or both on the prepartum behavior of sows , 1990 .

[10]  P. Jensen Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs , 1986 .

[11]  G. Cronin,et al.  The effects of providing sawdust to pre-parturient sows in farrowing crates on sow behaviour, the duration of parturition and the occurrence of intra-partum stillborn piglets , 1993 .

[12]  G. Cronin,et al.  The behaviour of primiparous sows around farrowing in response to restraint and straw bedding , 1994 .

[13]  Pre-farrowing behaviour of sows and gilts with access to space for locomotion , 1994 .

[14]  Philip N. Lehner,et al.  Handbook of ethological methods , 1979 .

[15]  P. Jensen Nest site choice and nest building of free-ranging domestic pigs due to farrow , 1989 .

[16]  D. G. M. Wood-Gush,et al.  The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment , 1989 .

[17]  D. Wood‐Gush,et al.  The development of social behaviour in piglets , 1982 .

[18]  D. Wood‐Gush,et al.  The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. , 1984, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.

[19]  H W Gonyou,et al.  Prepartum behavior of gilts in three farrowing environments. , 1988, Journal of animal science.