Assessment of Noise in Digital Electrocardiograms

BATCHVAROV, V., et al.: Assessment of Noise in Digital Electrocardiograms. Technically related noise in 12‐lead ECGs recorded with ambulatory recorders has never been systematically compared with that in ECGs recorded with conventional ECGs. This study compared serial 10‐second ECGs obtained in ten healthy men, age 22–45 years, who were recorded in the supine resting position using a (1) MAC VU recorder, (2) digital ambulatory SEER MC recorder with a Multi‐Link detachable ECG cable, and (3) digital ambulatory SEER MC recorder with a light ambulatory ECG cable. In each ECG, averaged sinus rhythm cycles of the entire recording were realigned with the native signal and subtracted. The resulting “residuum” was quantified by computing its standard deviation and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). While the RMSSD residuum values were significantly lower with the MAC VU recorder (6.27 ± 0.98 μV) than with the SEER MC recorder with either ECG cables (7.29 ± 1.31 and 7.17 ± 1.31 μV, P < 0.003 and p < 0.02), the difference was practically negligible and there was no detectable difference in the standard deviation residuum values. The study concludes that valid ECG investigations of serial ECG testing may be conducted using the ambulatory SEER MC recorders providing the biological sources of ECG noise are controlled. The available technology for noise assessment suggests that studies involving advanced analysis of serial ECGs (e.g., of drug related changes), should incorporate objective characterisation of ECG quality.

[1]  K. Woods,et al.  Reproducibility and automatic measurement of QT dispersion. , 1996, European heart journal.

[2]  A. Murray,et al.  Effects of filtering and algorithm parameters on automatic QT measurement techniques , 1994, Computers in Cardiology 1994.

[3]  R. E. Mason,et al.  A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. , 1966, American heart journal.

[4]  A Murray,et al.  Comparison of automatic QT measurement techniques in the normal 12 lead electrocardiogram. , 1995, British heart journal.

[5]  J. Anthony Gomes,et al.  Signal Averaged Electrocardiography , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[6]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Electrical alternans and vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  P Rubel,et al.  An improved method for the precise measurement of serial ECG changes in QRS duration and QT interval. Performance assessment on the CSE noise-testing database and a healthy 720 case-set population. , 1992, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  H Hayashi,et al.  [Signal-averaged electrocardiogram]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[9]  J. Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for P , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Luc Capdevila,et al.  Document , 2003 .