Songs of American Redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): Sequencing Rules and their Relationships to Repertoire Size

In order to determine the rules of sequencing of songs used by American redstarts, we related Markovian and hierarchical models to recordings obtained from free-living males. In the smaller repertoires of three or four songs, low order Markov chain models fitted the data. 9 of the 10 sequences so examined were first-order, and the last was second-order. Larger repertoires of 6 and 8 songs were hierarchical in organization with subsets of songs having independent sequencing rules. Most samples of singing were stationary in their transition rules over periods of several days: non-stationarity was sometimes associated with a change in the number of songs forming the sequence, or in repetitions of songs. We examine causal models of song sequencing and conclude that our results generally favor competition models, although some sequential dependencies may also apply. Hierarchical organization in the serial repertoires of American redstarts may reflect developmental influences rather than effects of repertoire size itself.

[1]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  The Relation Between Organization and Function of Song in Cardinals , 1968 .

[2]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Organization of song in cardinals , 1971 .

[3]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Markovian Versus Rhomboidal Patterning in the Song of Swainson's Thrush , 1977 .

[4]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  Song Repertoires of American Warblers (Parulinae): Honest Advertising or Assessment? , 2010 .

[5]  W. Wickler,et al.  Ontogeny of Song in Captive Duet-Singing Slate-Coloured Boubous (Laniarius Funebris). a Study in Birdsong Epigenesis , 1989 .

[6]  Andrew G. Horn,et al.  Repertoires and Countersinging in Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) , 2010 .

[7]  P. J. B. Slater,et al.  Sequences of song in chaffinches , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Markov Sequences in Songs of American Thrushes , 1979 .

[9]  Dennis J. Martin.  SONGS OF THE FOX SPARROW. III. ORDERING OF SONG , 1990 .

[10]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  Vocal Virtuosity in the Brown Thrasher , 1977 .

[11]  Peter Marler,et al.  Physical Analysis of a Simple Bird Song as Exemplified by the Chipping Sparrow , 1960 .

[12]  P. Slater,et al.  A Simple Model for Competition Between Behaviour Patterns , 1978 .

[13]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Sequence of songs in repertoires of western meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) , 1975 .

[14]  A. Houston.  Transitions and time-sharing , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Henrike Hultsch,et al.  Memorization and reproduction of songs in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): evidence for package formation , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  D. Borror,et al.  Songs of the Chipping Sparrow , 1959 .

[17]  Carl L. Whitney,et al.  Patterns of Singing in the Varied Thrush: II. A Model of Control , 2010 .

[18]  Nicholas S. Thompson,et al.  Species Specificity and Individual Variation in the Songs of the Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma Rufum) and Catbird (Dumetella Carolinensis) , 1976 .

[19]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Grooming in crickets: Timing and hierarchical organization , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Grooming in the veery and the American robin: Evidence for a simple timing hierarchy , 1986, Behavioural Processes.

[21]  D. Todt,et al.  Song acquisition and acquisition constraints in the nightingale, Luscinia megarhynchos , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.

[22]  C. Chatfield,et al.  Analysing sequences of behavioural events. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Song Repertoires and Song Sharing by American Redstarts , 1985 .