Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response

Measurements were made of the ability of observers, whose accommodation had been paralysed, to detect the small changes in contrast resulting from sinusoidal, oscillatory changes in the dioptric focus of test objects, as a function of the mean position of focus. Variables studied included the form and wavelength composition of the test object, the diameter of the entrance pupil of the eye and the temporal frequency of the focus change. The dioptric amplitudes of the thresholds found (approximately 0.1 D) were comparable with the normally observed amplitudes of the microfluctuations of the accommodation system of the eye. A maximum for the threshold change of focus was found to occur about a mean position of focus corresponding to the nominal "best-focus". Two threshold minima occurred symmetrically on either side of this position of optimal mean focus; the positions of these minima depended on the spatial frequency content of the test object and the pupil diameter. The results are interpreted in terms of the corresponding through-focus changes in optical modulation transfer of the eye and data on the sensitivity of the visual system to spatial and temporal modulation. For sinusoidal grating test objects, it appears that the results can qualitatively be explained if it is assumed that the detectable focus change is such that the ratio of the modulation change in the retinal image, produced by the focus change, to the modulation at the mean position of focus is constant. Results for targets of broad spatial bandwidth suggest that sensitivity to focus change may be dominated by spatial frequency components approximately 5 c/deg. The implications of the data for the understanding of the accommodation control system are briefly considered.

[1]  G. Wyszecki,et al.  Axial chromatic aberration of the human eye. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  W N Charman,et al.  Objective technique for the determination of monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  W N Charman,et al.  Accommodation as a Function of Object Form , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[5]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  G. vonBahr Studies on the depth of focus of the eye. , 1952 .

[7]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Spatial frequency dependence of accommodative responses in amblyopic eyes , 1983, Vision Research.

[9]  G. Legge A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  J M Wolfe,et al.  ACCOMMODATION FOR FLICKERING STIMULI , 1985, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  D. Fender,et al.  CONTROL MECHANISMS OF THE EYE. , 1964, Scientific American.

[12]  T. Welberry,et al.  Atlas of optical transforms , 1975 .

[13]  M. Alpern,et al.  Variability of accommodation during steady fixation at various levels of illuminance. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  H. Knoll,et al.  The effect of luminance, target configuration and lenses upon the refractive state of the eye. I. , 1956, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Lo J. Bour,et al.  The influence of the spatial distribution of a target on the dynamic response and fluctuations of the accommodation of the human eye , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  W. N. Charman,et al.  The optical phase transfer function of the eye and the perception of spatial phase , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  Meredith W. Morgan,et al.  ACCOMMODATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO CONVERGENCE , 1944 .

[18]  D. Flitcroft Effects of temporal frequency on the contrast sensitivity of the human accommodation system , 1988, Vision Research.

[19]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  D. A. Owens A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings , 1980, Vision Research.

[22]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets , 1987, Vision Research.

[23]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Contrast increment thresholds of rhesus monkeys , 1982, Vision Research.

[24]  P. Denieul,et al.  Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluctuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye , 1982, Vision Research.

[25]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[26]  C. A. Dvorak,et al.  Detection and discrimination of blur in edges and lines , 1981 .

[27]  H. D. Crane A theoretical analysis of the visual accommodation system in humans. NASA CR-606. , 1966, NASA contractor report. NASA CR. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[28]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  The Accommodative Response to Subthreshold Blur and to Perceptual Fading during the Troxler Phenomenon , 1986, Perception.

[29]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Significance of fluctuations of accommodation. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[30]  Relation of threshold criterion to the functional receptors of the eye. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of chromatic aberration on visual acuity , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[33]  G. Heath,et al.  The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye. , 1956, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[34]  W N Charman,et al.  Fluctuations in accommodation: a review , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[35]  Optical detector for objects within an adjustable range. , 1964, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[36]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object , 1977, Vision Research.